PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIBAX vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIBAX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America (AIBAX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIBAX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, AIBAX has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 1.60%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.80% annualized return.


AIBAX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.17%
YTD
-0.50%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
2.83%
3Y*
4.11%
5Y*
0.92%
10Y*
1.60%

FXAIX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.79%
6M
8.79%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*
15.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIBAX vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIBAX
American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America
-0.50%6.83%2.91%4.09%-8.02%-0.89%7.36%4.40%0.92%1.06%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
9.79%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AIBAX and FXAIX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011

-0.11

The correlation between AIBAX and FXAIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIBAX vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIBAX
AIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
AIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIBAX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America (AIBAX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIBAXFXAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.39

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

3.02

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.04

13.62

-9.58

AIBAX vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIBAX and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIBAX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIBAX drawdown since its inception was -11.42%, smaller than the maximum FXAIX drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBAX and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIBAXFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.42%

-33.79%

+22.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-8.89%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.99%

-18.76%

+15.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.33%

-24.50%

+13.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.42%

-33.79%

+22.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-1.72%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-3.79%

+2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

1.97%

-1.21%

Volatility

AIBAX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America (AIBAX) is 0.95%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that AIBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIBAXFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

4.68%

-3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.13%

9.84%

-7.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

12.50%

-9.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.20%

17.00%

-12.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.29%

18.12%

-14.83%

AIBAX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIBAX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIBAX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

AIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than FXAIX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIBAX
American Funds Intermediate Bond Fund of America
3.88%3.87%4.00%3.01%1.63%0.91%3.25%2.59%1.66%1.21%1.72%1.85%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.04%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIBAX and FXAIX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXAIX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to AIBAX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIBAX dropped -11.42% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIBAX and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer