PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIA vs. VLUE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIA vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AIA having a 44.56% return and VLUE slightly higher at 45.72%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AIA having a 15.05% annualized return and VLUE not far ahead at 15.38%.


AIA

1D
0.54%
1M
3.01%
YTD
44.56%
6M
50.54%
1Y
80.18%
3Y*
34.57%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
15.05%

VLUE

1D
0.40%
1M
7.90%
YTD
45.72%
6M
46.53%
1Y
83.16%
3Y*
31.47%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
15.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIA vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
44.56%47.79%20.26%4.32%-24.08%-10.91%33.73%22.21%-14.22%45.00%
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
45.72%32.67%7.25%14.26%-14.17%28.93%-0.23%27.20%-11.13%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between AIA and VLUE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.58

The correlation between AIA and VLUE shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (5 years) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIA vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIA
VLUE

Technology

56.8%
44.5%

Financial Services

19.3%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.3%

Communication Services

8.9%
8.3%

Industrials

2.6%
7.4%

Healthcare

0.9%
8.5%

Energy

0.7%
3.2%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.0%

Utilities

-

2.0%

Technology

AIA
56.8%
VLUE
44.5%

Financial Services

AIA
19.3%
VLUE
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

AIA
10.1%
VLUE
8.3%

Communication Services

AIA
8.9%
VLUE
8.3%

Industrials

AIA
2.6%
VLUE
7.4%

Healthcare

AIA
0.9%
VLUE
8.5%

Energy

AIA
0.7%
VLUE
3.2%

Real Estate

AIA
0.6%
VLUE
1.8%

Basic Materials

AIA

-

VLUE
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

AIA

-

VLUE
4.0%

Utilities

AIA

-

VLUE
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIA vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIA
AIA Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIA Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VLUE
VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIA vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIAVLUEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.77

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

9.25

-3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.76

39.16

-19.40

AIA vs. VLUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIA Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is lower than the VLUE Sharpe Ratio of 4.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIA and VLUE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIA vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, which is greater than VLUE's maximum drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and VLUE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIAVLUEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.89%

-39.47%

-21.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-9.04%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.64%

-17.89%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.11%

-27.12%

-22.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.64%

-39.47%

-15.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.44%

-2.61%

-3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.66%

-6.01%

-10.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

2.13%

+1.95%

Volatility

AIA vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a higher volatility of 14.34% compared to iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) at 8.83%. This indicates that AIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIAVLUEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.34%

8.83%

+5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.49%

15.31%

+9.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.93%

18.38%

+9.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.96%

18.00%

+7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.78%

19.91%

+3.87%

AIA vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VLUE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIA vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison

AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than VLUE's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
1.73%2.50%2.78%2.07%2.59%1.54%1.11%2.24%2.49%1.45%2.29%2.88%
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
1.43%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIA and VLUE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIA has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to VLUE (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIA dropped -60.89% vs VLUE's -39.47%.

On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.38% vs 15.05% for AIA. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VLUE has been the lower-risk option at 8.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.38% return vs 15.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for AIA.

AIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.43% for VLUE.

AIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VLUE is Large Cap Value Equities. AIA tracks S&P Asia 50, while VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AIA and 0.15% for VLUE.

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.55 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIA and VLUE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer