AIA vs. IB01.L
AIA (iShares Asia 50 ETF) and IB01.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - AIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P Asia 50, while IB01.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIA returned 12.70%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for IB01.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IB01.L.
Performance
AIA vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 50.12% return, which is significantly higher than IB01.L's 1.56% return.
AIA
- 1D
- 3.85%
- 1M
- 10.80%
- YTD
- 50.12%
- 6M
- 57.01%
- 1Y
- 90.86%
- 3Y*
- 35.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.70%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
IB01.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
AIA vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 50.12% | 47.79% | 20.26% | 4.32% | -24.08% | -10.91% | 33.73% | 11.69% |
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.56% | 4.34% | 5.25% | 4.92% | 1.08% | -0.85% | 0.88% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIA and IB01.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019 | 0.01 |
The correlation between AIA and IB01.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.03 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIA vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank
AIA
IB01.L
AIA vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIA | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -33.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 7.99 | -6.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.46 | 114.79 | -108.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.37 | 574.12 | -551.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIA vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, which is greater than IB01.L's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and IB01.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIA | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.89% | -1.28% | -59.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | -0.03% | -14.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.64% | -0.09% | -21.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.11% | -1.15% | -48.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | 0.00% | -2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.66% | -0.24% | -16.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 0.01% | +4.07% |
Volatility
AIA vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a higher volatility of 14.78% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) at 0.09%. This indicates that AIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIA | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.78% | 0.09% | +14.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.69% | 0.23% | +24.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.13% | 0.33% | +27.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.02% | 0.54% | +25.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.82% | 0.79% | +23.03% |
AIA vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IB01.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIA vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison
AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while IB01.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 1.54% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.49% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% |
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIA and IB01.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IB01.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IB01.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for AIA.
AIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IB01.L is Government Bonds. AIA tracks S&P Asia 50, while IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AIA and 0.07% for IB01.L.
Find the right allocation for AIA and IB01.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer