AHYB vs. SDMF
AHYB (American Century Select High Yield ETF) and SDMF (Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AHYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (BB), while SDMF is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the DBi CTA Managed Futures Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. AHYB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SDMF.
Performance
AHYB vs. SDMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AHYB
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 6.50%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDMF
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AHYB vs. SDMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AHYB American Century Select High Yield ETF | 0.52% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 2.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between AHYB and SDMF is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AHYB vs. SDMF — Risk / Return Rank
AHYB
SDMF
AHYB vs. SDMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Select High Yield ETF (AHYB) and Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AHYB | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AHYB | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.81 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
AHYB vs. SDMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHYB drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than SDMF's maximum drawdown of -6.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHYB and SDMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHYB | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -6.23% | -8.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.40% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -2.24% | -1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | — | — |
Volatility
AHYB vs. SDMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AHYB | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36% | 13.20% | -9.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 13.20% | -6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 13.20% | -6.06% |
AHYB vs. SDMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHYB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SDMF's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AHYB vs. SDMF - Dividend Comparison
AHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, while SDMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHYB American Century Select High Yield ETF | 6.00% | 5.80% | 5.87% | 5.28% | 5.06% | 0.60% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AHYB and SDMF have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDMF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDMF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AHYB.
AHYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.00%, compared with 0.00% for SDMF.
AHYB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SDMF is Systematic Trend. AHYB tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (BB), while SDMF tracks DBi CTA Managed Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AHYB and 0.35% for SDMF.
Find the right allocation for AHYB and SDMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer