PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHMFX vs. FAQTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHMFX vs. FAQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) and American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1 (FAQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHMFX achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than FAQTX's 6.38% return. Over the past 10 years, AHMFX has underperformed FAQTX with an annualized return of 3.19%, while FAQTX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.07% annualized return.


AHMFX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-2.06%
6M
0.60%
YTD
1.26%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
3.19%
ALL TIME*
5.92%

FAQTX

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.45%
6M
4.07%
YTD
6.38%
1Y
13.90%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
10.07%
ALL TIME*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AHMFX vs. FAQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AHMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2
1.26%6.03%6.45%7.04%-12.44%5.49%4.61%9.12%1.80%9.09%
FAQTX
American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1
6.38%16.70%12.40%16.47%-16.54%15.16%17.15%22.78%-5.50%20.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AHMFX and FAQTX is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2014

0.03

Over the past year, AHMFX and FAQTX have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHMFX vs. FAQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AHMFX
AHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FAQTX
FAQTX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FAQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FAQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AHMFX vs. FAQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) and American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1 (FAQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AHMFXFAQTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.27

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

1.91

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.74

8.21

+0.53

AHMFX vs. FAQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the FAQTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHMFX and FAQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AHMFX vs. FAQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHMFX drawdown since its inception was -17.65%, smaller than the maximum FAQTX drawdown of -26.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHMFX and FAQTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHMFXFAQTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.65%

-26.70%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-7.01%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.68%

-10.56%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.65%

-23.34%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.65%

-26.70%

+9.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-0.95%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.35%

-3.88%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

1.62%

-0.82%

Volatility

AHMFX vs. FAQTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) is 0.93%, while American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1 (FAQTX) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that AHMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHMFXFAQTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

2.28%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.39%

7.36%

-4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

9.09%

-6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

11.51%

-6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.55%

12.66%

-8.11%

AHMFX vs. FAQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHMFX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FAQTX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

AHMFX vs. FAQTX - Dividend Comparison

AHMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than FAQTX's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2
3.81%5.58%4.04%2.97%2.71%3.44%3.60%3.68%3.88%4.19%3.74%4.19%
FAQTX
American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1
5.64%6.00%4.26%2.61%5.41%5.26%3.56%4.23%4.82%2.43%3.73%5.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHMFX and FAQTX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAQTX has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to AHMFX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHMFX dropped -17.65% vs FAQTX's -26.70%.

AHMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHMFX and FAQTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer