PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAQTX vs. RFNGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAQTX vs. RFNGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1 (FAQTX) and American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 (RFNGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAQTX achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than RFNGX's 11.96% return. Over the past 10 years, FAQTX has underperformed RFNGX with an annualized return of 9.93%, while RFNGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.52% annualized return.


FAQTX

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.36%
6M
2.96%
YTD
5.75%
1Y
11.86%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
9.93%
ALL TIME*
8.94%

RFNGX

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.54%
6M
6.83%
YTD
11.96%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
14.52%
ALL TIME*
13.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FAQTX vs. RFNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAQTX
American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1
5.75%16.70%12.40%16.47%-16.54%15.16%17.15%22.78%-5.50%20.65%
RFNGX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6
11.96%24.58%22.77%26.25%-16.38%22.83%13.72%27.48%-7.09%23.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FAQTX and RFNGX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2014

0.97

The correlation between FAQTX and RFNGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAQTX vs. RFNGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAQTX
FAQTX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FAQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FAQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

RFNGX
RFNGX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RFNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RFNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAQTX vs. RFNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1 (FAQTX) and American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 (RFNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAQTXRFNGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.05

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

8.98

-1.81

FAQTX vs. RFNGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAQTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the RFNGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAQTX and RFNGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAQTX vs. RFNGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAQTX drawdown since its inception was -26.70%, smaller than the maximum RFNGX drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAQTX and RFNGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAQTXRFNGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.70%

-33.90%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-10.62%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.56%

-17.92%

+7.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.34%

-24.88%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.70%

-33.90%

+7.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-2.88%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-4.00%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.43%

-0.82%

Volatility

FAQTX vs. RFNGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1 (FAQTX) is 1.98%, while American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 (RFNGX) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that FAQTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFNGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAQTXRFNGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

3.61%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

11.84%

-4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.03%

14.95%

-5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.51%

16.97%

-5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.66%

17.75%

-5.09%

FAQTX vs. RFNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAQTX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RFNGX's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAQTX vs. RFNGX - Dividend Comparison

FAQTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, less than RFNGX's 7.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAQTX
American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1
5.67%6.00%4.26%2.61%5.41%5.26%3.56%4.23%4.82%2.43%3.73%5.68%
RFNGX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6
7.73%8.82%8.91%6.10%5.33%11.29%1.77%7.21%10.67%7.56%5.01%6.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FAQTX and RFNGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RFNGX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to FAQTX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAQTX dropped -26.70% vs RFNGX's -33.90%.

RFNGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAQTX and RFNGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer