PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHLPX vs. TFBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHLPX vs. TFBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) and American Beacon TwentyFour Sustainable Short Term Bond Fund (TFBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHLPX achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly higher than TFBYX's 0.79% return.


AHLPX

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.55%
YTD
12.34%
6M
14.34%
1Y
29.81%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
4.69%

TFBYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.09%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
5.71%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHLPX vs. TFBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AHLPX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund
12.34%2.19%1.74%-4.20%16.48%4.67%5.94%
TFBYX
American Beacon TwentyFour Sustainable Short Term Bond Fund
0.79%5.58%5.81%7.22%-3.86%0.70%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AHLPX and TFBYX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2020

-0.10

The correlation between AHLPX and TFBYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (5 years) to 0.08 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHLPX vs. TFBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHLPX
AHLPX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AHLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AHLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TFBYX
TFBYX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TFBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TFBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHLPX vs. TFBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) and American Beacon TwentyFour Sustainable Short Term Bond Fund (TFBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHLPXTFBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.58

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.05

2.56

+3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.32

8.70

+10.63

AHLPX vs. TFBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHLPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the TFBYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHLPX and TFBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHLPXTFBYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

2.20

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

1.82

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

1.76

-1.34

Drawdowns

AHLPX vs. TFBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHLPX drawdown since its inception was -21.90%, which is greater than TFBYX's maximum drawdown of -7.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLPX and TFBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHLPXTFBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.90%

-7.41%

-14.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-1.60%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

-1.60%

-20.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

-7.41%

-14.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.23%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-1.16%

-5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

0.47%

+1.10%

Volatility

AHLPX vs. TFBYX - Volatility Comparison

American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to American Beacon TwentyFour Sustainable Short Term Bond Fund (TFBYX) at 0.70%. This indicates that AHLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHLPXTFBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

0.70%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

1.63%

+5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

1.85%

+8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.64%

1.63%

+8.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.51%

1.68%

+7.83%

AHLPX vs. TFBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHLPX has a 1.83% expense ratio, which is higher than TFBYX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

AHLPX vs. TFBYX - Dividend Comparison

AHLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than TFBYX's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHLPX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund
7.19%8.07%0.29%0.63%17.64%7.15%5.14%4.17%1.45%4.07%0.00%3.40%
TFBYX
American Beacon TwentyFour Sustainable Short Term Bond Fund
3.78%3.84%3.79%3.73%12.53%3.07%2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHLPX and TFBYX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AHLPX has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to TFBYX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHLPX dropped -21.90% vs TFBYX's -7.41%.

AHLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHLPX and TFBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer