PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHLIX vs. AHTPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHLIX vs. AHTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) and American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHLIX achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly higher than AHTPX's 6.27% return.


AHLIX

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.19%
6M
4.37%
YTD
10.28%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
4.76%
ALL TIME*
4.14%

AHTPX

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.87%
6M
0.71%
YTD
6.27%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AHLIX vs. AHTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AHLIX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5
10.28%2.59%2.07%-3.85%16.94%5.09%10.71%0.44%-0.09%
AHTPX
American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund
6.27%7.76%6.73%13.48%-16.81%13.63%5.18%26.87%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AHLIX and AHTPX is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2018

0.22

Over the past year, AHLIX and AHTPX have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHLIX vs. AHTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AHLIX
AHLIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AHLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AHLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

AHTPX
AHTPX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AHTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AHTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AHLIX vs. AHTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) and American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AHLIXAHTPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.31

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.05

2.29

+4.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.42

5.68

+11.74

AHLIX vs. AHTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the AHTPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHLIX and AHTPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AHLIX vs. AHTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHLIX drawdown since its inception was -21.62%, which is greater than AHTPX's maximum drawdown of -19.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLIX and AHTPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHLIXAHTPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.62%

-19.23%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-7.26%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-12.89%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-19.23%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-4.22%

+1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.49%

-5.61%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

2.93%

-1.49%

Volatility

AHLIX vs. AHTPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) is 2.45%, while American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that AHLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AHTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHLIXAHTPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

2.60%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

6.47%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

9.79%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.65%

9.65%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.51%

8.94%

+0.57%

AHLIX vs. AHTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHLIX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than AHTPX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

AHLIX vs. AHTPX - Dividend Comparison

AHLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, which matches AHTPX's 7.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHLIX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5
7.48%8.25%0.55%1.10%17.63%7.44%5.33%4.47%1.83%4.01%0.00%3.51%
AHTPX
American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund
7.51%7.98%4.80%3.63%5.07%18.73%0.54%4.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHLIX and AHTPX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AHTPX has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to AHLIX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHLIX dropped -21.62% vs AHTPX's -19.23%.

AHLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHLIX and AHTPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer