AHTPX vs. RSBT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT).

AHTPX is managed by American Beacon. It was launched on Dec 30, 2018. RSBT is an actively managed fund by Return Stacked. It was launched on Feb 7, 2023.

Performance

AHTPX vs. RSBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AHTPX vs. RSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AHTPX American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund	3.28%	7.76%	6.73%	9.05%
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	5.19%	10.31%	-2.90%	-11.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHTPX achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than RSBT's 5.19% return.

AHTPX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -6.92%
• YTD: 3.28%
• 6M: 8.45%
• 1Y: 10.56%
• 3Y*: 8.83%
• 5Y*: 5.05%
• 10Y*: —

RSBT

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -4.56%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 6M: 11.52%
• 1Y: 14.67%
• 3Y*: 2.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHTPX vs. RSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHTPX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than RSBT's 0.97% expense ratio.

AHTPX

American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund

RSBT

Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF

Return for Risk

AHTPX vs. RSBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHTPX

AHTPX Risk / Return Rank: 36
AHTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
AHTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
AHTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
AHTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
AHTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

RSBT

RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 54
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHTPX vs. RSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AHTPX	RSBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	0.99	-0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	1.35	-0.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.18	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	1.72	-0.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.30	3.77	-1.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AHTPX vs. RSBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHTPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the RSBT Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHTPX and RSBT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AHTPX	RSBT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	0.99	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	-0.02	+0.86

Correlation

The correlation between AHTPX and RSBT is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AHTPX vs. RSBT - Dividend Comparison

AHTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than RSBT's 3.04% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AHTPX American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund	7.73%	7.98%	4.80%	3.63%	5.07%	18.73%	0.54%	4.51%
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	3.04%	3.20%	0.00%	2.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AHTPX vs. RSBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHTPX drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum RSBT drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHTPX and RSBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AHTPX	RSBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.23%	-23.60%	+4.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.94%	-8.17%	-1.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.92%	-4.56%	-2.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-13.22%	+7.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	4.04%	+0.10%

Volatility

AHTPX vs. RSBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) is 3.73%, while Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that AHTPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AHTPX	RSBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	3.95%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.40%	11.28%	-2.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.14%	14.95%	-3.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.70%	13.90%	-4.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.01%	13.90%	-4.89%