PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHLIX vs. QNZNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHLIX vs. QNZNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHLIX achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly lower than QNZNX's 14.54% return.


AHLIX

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
11.86%
6M
11.74%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
5.02%

QNZNX

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
14.54%
6M
14.89%
1Y
36.49%
3Y*
29.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHLIX vs. QNZNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AHLIX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5
11.86%2.59%2.07%-3.85%9.33%
QNZNX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund
14.54%22.88%34.96%22.73%1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between AHLIX and QNZNX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022

0.33

Over the past year, AHLIX and QNZNX have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHLIX vs. QNZNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHLIX
AHLIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AHLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AHLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

QNZNX
QNZNX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
QNZNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNZNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNZNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QNZNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNZNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHLIX vs. QNZNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AHLIXQNZNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.58

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.01

7.36

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.89

26.54

-7.65

AHLIX vs. QNZNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the QNZNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHLIX and QNZNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AHLIX vs. QNZNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHLIX drawdown since its inception was -21.62%, which is greater than QNZNX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLIX and QNZNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHLIXQNZNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.62%

-18.38%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.91%

-4.88%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-13.48%

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-3.42%

+2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-2.77%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.35%

+0.21%

Volatility

AHLIX vs. QNZNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) is 2.36%, while AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that AHLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QNZNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHLIXQNZNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

3.35%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.79%

7.49%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

11.01%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.60%

12.06%

-2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.48%

12.06%

-2.58%

AHLIX vs. QNZNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHLIX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than QNZNX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

AHLIX vs. QNZNX - Dividend Comparison

AHLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than QNZNX's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHLIX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5
7.38%8.25%0.55%1.10%17.63%7.44%5.33%4.47%1.83%4.01%0.00%3.51%
QNZNX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund
0.75%0.86%16.46%23.14%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHLIX and QNZNX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QNZNX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to AHLIX (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHLIX dropped -21.62% vs QNZNX's -18.38%.

QNZNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHLIX and QNZNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer