PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHTPX vs. AHLPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHTPX vs. AHLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHTPX achieves a 8.90% return, which is significantly lower than AHLPX's 11.59% return.


AHTPX

1D
0.35%
1M
1.31%
YTD
8.90%
6M
9.63%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
9.68%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*

AHLPX

1D
0.68%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
11.59%
6M
11.47%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
4.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHTPX vs. AHLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AHTPX
American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund
8.90%7.76%6.73%13.48%-16.81%13.63%5.18%26.87%0.00%
AHLPX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund
11.59%2.19%1.74%-4.20%16.48%4.67%10.36%0.09%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between AHTPX and AHLPX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2018

0.22

Over the past year, AHTPX and AHLPX have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHTPX vs. AHLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHTPX
AHTPX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AHTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AHTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

AHLPX
AHLPX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AHLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AHLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHTPX vs. AHLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AHTPXAHLPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.49

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

5.79

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.97

18.28

-10.31

AHTPX vs. AHLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHTPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the AHLPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHTPX and AHLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AHTPX vs. AHLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHTPX drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum AHLPX drawdown of -21.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHTPX and AHLPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHTPXAHLPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-21.90%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-5.02%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.89%

-21.90%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-21.90%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-0.95%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-6.75%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

1.59%

+1.07%

Volatility

AHTPX vs. AHLPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) is 2.23%, while American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) has a volatility of 2.43%. This indicates that AHTPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AHLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHTPXAHLPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.23%

2.43%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.83%

7.75%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.40%

10.82%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.65%

9.63%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.94%

9.52%

-0.58%

AHTPX vs. AHLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHTPX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is lower than AHLPX's 1.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

AHTPX vs. AHLPX - Dividend Comparison

AHTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, more than AHLPX's 7.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHLPX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund
7.24%8.07%0.29%0.63%17.64%7.15%5.14%4.17%1.45%4.07%0.00%3.40%
AHTPX
American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund
7.33%7.98%4.80%3.63%5.07%18.73%0.54%4.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHTPX and AHLPX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AHLPX has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to AHTPX (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHTPX dropped -19.23% vs AHLPX's -21.90%.

AHLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHTPX and AHLPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer