PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGZ vs. TFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGZ vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGZ achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than TFLO's 2.22% return. Over the past 10 years, AGZ has underperformed TFLO with an annualized return of 1.74%, while TFLO has yielded a comparatively higher 2.41% annualized return.


AGZ

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.37%
6M
0.06%
YTD
0.14%
1Y
2.32%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*
1.74%
ALL TIME*
2.35%

TFLO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.88%
YTD
2.22%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
2.41%
ALL TIME*
1.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.57M$1.51M$1.37M
$79.31M$72.74M$75.47M

AGZ vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGZ
iShares Agency Bond ETF
0.14%6.05%3.08%5.18%-7.77%-1.05%5.77%5.51%1.32%2.01%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
2.22%4.22%5.34%5.12%1.99%-0.02%0.43%2.04%1.76%1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AGZ and TFLO is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGZ vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AGZ
AGZ Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLO
TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AGZ vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGZTFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-12.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-45.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

12.34

-11.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

199.41

-197.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

766.49

-760.03

AGZ vs. TFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the TFLO Sharpe Ratio of 13.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGZ and TFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGZ vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGZ drawdown since its inception was -11.01%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGZ and TFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGZTFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.01%

-5.01%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-0.02%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.85%

-0.04%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.65%

-0.13%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.01%

-0.16%

-10.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

0.00%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-0.10%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.01%

+0.45%

Volatility

AGZ vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) has a higher volatility of 0.66% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.08%. This indicates that AGZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGZTFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

0.08%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.01%

0.19%

+1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54%

0.29%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.55%

0.35%

+3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.03%

0.45%

+2.58%

AGZ vs. TFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TFLO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGZ vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison

AGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than TFLO's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGZ
iShares Agency Bond ETF
3.39%3.75%3.48%3.14%1.56%0.96%2.25%2.32%2.15%1.58%1.52%1.30%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
3.47%4.16%5.21%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGZ and TFLO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGZ has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to TFLO (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGZ dropped -11.01% vs TFLO's -5.01%.

On 10-year performance, TFLO leads with 2.41% vs 1.74% for AGZ. On fees, TFLO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TFLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TFLO has performed better with a 2.41% return vs 1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TFLO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AGZ.

TFLO has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 3.39% for AGZ.

AGZ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Agency Bond Index (USD), while TFLO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AGZ and 0.15% for TFLO.

TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.73 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGZ and TFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer