AGZ vs. PYLD
AGZ (iShares Agency Bond ETF) and PYLD (PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AGZ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Agency Bond Index (USD), while PYLD is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. AGZ is passively managed, while PYLD is actively managed. Over the past year, AGZ returned 3.95% vs 7.40% for PYLD. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AGZ charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PYLD.
Performance
AGZ vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGZ achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than PYLD's 0.95% return.
AGZ
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- 1.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
PYLD
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGZ vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZ iShares Agency Bond ETF | 0.16% | 6.05% | 3.08% | 3.26% |
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 0.95% | 9.57% | 7.69% | 5.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGZ and PYLD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023 | 0.74 |
The correlation between AGZ and PYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGZ vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank
AGZ
PYLD
AGZ vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGZ | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.48 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.29 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.76 | 10.44 | -0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGZ | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 2.42 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 2.04 | -1.36 |
Drawdowns
AGZ vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGZ drawdown since its inception was -11.01%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGZ and PYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGZ | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.01% | -4.52% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | -3.25% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -0.44% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -0.65% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | 0.71% | -0.30% |
Volatility
AGZ vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) is 0.76%, while PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that AGZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGZ | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 1.24% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.93% | 2.50% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58% | 3.08% | -0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 3.99% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.03% | 3.99% | -0.96% |
AGZ vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGZ vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison
AGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than PYLD's 6.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZ iShares Agency Bond ETF | 3.73% | 3.75% | 3.48% | 3.14% | 1.56% | 0.96% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 2.15% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.30% |
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 6.30% | 6.21% | 6.40% | 2.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGZ and PYLD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYLD has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to AGZ (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGZ dropped -11.01% vs PYLD's -4.52%.
On 1-year performance, PYLD leads with 7.40% vs 3.95% for AGZ. On fees, AGZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, AGZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PYLD has performed better with a 7.40% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PYLD.
PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.30%, compared with 3.73% for AGZ.
AGZ is categorized as Government Bonds, while PYLD is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AGZ and 0.55% for PYLD.
PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGZ and PYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer