PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGZ vs. PTRQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGZ vs. PTRQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGZ achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than PTRQX's 0.68% return. Over the past 10 years, AGZ has underperformed PTRQX with an annualized return of 1.83%, while PTRQX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.58% annualized return.


AGZ

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.29%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.10%
5Y*
1.15%
10Y*
1.83%

PTRQX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.50%
YTD
0.68%
6M
0.66%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
5.47%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*
2.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGZ vs. PTRQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGZ
iShares Agency Bond ETF
0.16%6.05%3.08%5.18%-7.77%-1.05%5.77%5.51%1.32%2.01%
PTRQX
PGIM Total Return Bond R6
0.68%7.81%3.06%7.80%-14.30%-1.37%8.13%10.85%-0.73%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between AGZ and PTRQX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.71

The correlation between AGZ and PTRQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGZ vs. PTRQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGZ
AGZ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
AGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PTRQX
PTRQX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PTRQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTRQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTRQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PTRQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTRQX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGZ vs. PTRQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) and PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGZPTRQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.04

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.76

6.20

+3.56

AGZ vs. PTRQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the PTRQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGZ and PTRQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGZPTRQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.48

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.17

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.49

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.75

-0.07

Drawdowns

AGZ vs. PTRQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGZ drawdown since its inception was -11.01%, smaller than the maximum PTRQX drawdown of -20.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGZ and PTRQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGZPTRQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.01%

-20.72%

+9.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-3.08%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.85%

-5.47%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.66%

-20.69%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.01%

-20.72%

+9.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-1.34%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-3.29%

+1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

1.01%

-0.60%

Volatility

AGZ vs. PTRQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) is 0.76%, while PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that AGZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTRQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGZPTRQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

1.98%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.93%

3.22%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58%

4.27%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.54%

6.03%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.03%

5.25%

-2.22%

AGZ vs. PTRQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PTRQX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGZ vs. PTRQX - Dividend Comparison

AGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than PTRQX's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGZ
iShares Agency Bond ETF
3.73%3.75%3.48%3.14%1.56%0.96%2.25%2.32%2.15%1.58%1.52%1.30%
PTRQX
PGIM Total Return Bond R6
4.67%4.63%4.89%4.70%5.83%2.82%3.05%6.95%3.99%2.93%4.01%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGZ and PTRQX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTRQX has higher volatility (1.98%) compared to AGZ (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGZ dropped -11.01% vs PTRQX's -20.72%.

AGZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGZ and PTRQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer