AGRW vs. ITOT
AGRW (Allspring LT Large Growth ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Allspring, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. AGRW is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past year, AGRW returned 23.16% vs 28.12% for ITOT. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AGRW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
AGRW vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGRW achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.25% return.
AGRW
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 23.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
AGRW vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF | 8.77% | 23.16% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 21.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGRW and ITOT is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | 0.89 |
The correlation between AGRW and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGRW vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
AGRW
ITOT
AGRW vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGRW | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.42 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 3.17 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 14.57 | -9.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGRW | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.32 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.57 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
AGRW vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGRW drawdown since its inception was -16.46%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRW and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGRW | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.46% | -55.20% | +38.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.46% | -8.90% | -7.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -0.73% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -6.97% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 1.94% | +2.97% |
Volatility
AGRW vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that AGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGRW | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 2.99% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 9.13% | +3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 12.20% | +3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 17.36% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 18.26% | +3.73% |
AGRW vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGRW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGRW vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
AGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGRW and ITOT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGRW has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGRW dropped -16.46% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 1-year performance, ITOT leads with 28.12% vs 23.16% for AGRW. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 28.12% return vs 23.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AGRW.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.12% for AGRW.
AGRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Allspring and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AGRW and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGRW and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer