AGQ vs. SSO
AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - AGQ is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%), while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AGQ returned 11.35%/yr vs 24.21%/yr for SSO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AGQ charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
AGQ vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGQ achieves a -30.83% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 19.37% return. Over the past 10 years, AGQ has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 11.35%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.21% annualized return.
AGQ
- 1D
- -5.25%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -30.83%
- 6M
- -5.75%
- 1Y
- 142.76%
- 3Y*
- 54.17%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
SSO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 9.75%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 18.81%
- 1Y
- 52.69%
- 3Y*
- 37.56%
- 5Y*
- 19.62%
- 10Y*
- 24.21%
AGQ vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -30.83% | 360.71% | 23.92% | -15.09% | -7.89% | -32.25% | 62.02% | 20.02% | -22.10% | 5.49% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 19.37% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGQ and SSO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2008 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGQ vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
AGQ
SSO
AGQ vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGQ | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 2.25 | -1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 2.86 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 2.91 | -1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 12.80 | -9.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGQ | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 2.25 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.59 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.68 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.42 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
AGQ vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGQ drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, which is greater than SSO's maximum drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQ and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGQ | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.16% | -84.67% | -13.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.21% | -18.17% | -58.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.21% | -35.21% | -41.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.21% | -46.73% | -29.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.25% | -59.34% | -16.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.31% | -1.40% | -83.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.86% | -19.57% | -60.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.92% | 4.13% | +35.79% |
Volatility
AGQ vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a higher volatility of 33.51% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 5.66%. This indicates that AGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGQ | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.51% | 5.66% | +27.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 133.70% | 17.78% | +115.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.79% | 23.60% | +97.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.68% | 33.65% | +41.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.66% | 35.89% | +29.77% |
AGQ vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGQ has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGQ vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGQ and SSO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGQ has higher volatility (33.51%) compared to SSO (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGQ dropped -98.16% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.21% vs 11.35% for AGQ. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.21% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.93% for AGQ.
SSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for AGQ.
AGQ is categorized as Silver, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. AGQ tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.93% for AGQ and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGQ and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer