AGQ vs. GLDU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO).
AGQ and GLDU.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Silver (200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. GLDU.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 2008. Both AGQ and GLDU.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AGQ vs. GLDU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGQ vs. GLDU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -22.96% | 360.71% | 23.92% | -15.09% | -7.89% | -32.25% | 62.02% | 20.02% | -22.10% | 5.49% |
GLDU.TO BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF | 8.10% | 139.61% | 30.96% | 15.85% | -15.84% | -13.38% | 37.75% | 35.58% | -17.62% | 27.66% |
Different Trading Currencies
AGQ is traded in USD, while GLDU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GLDU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGQ achieves a -22.96% return, which is significantly lower than GLDU.TO's 8.10% return. Over the past 10 years, AGQ has underperformed GLDU.TO with an annualized return of 14.30%, while GLDU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.
AGQ
- 1D
- 15.10%
- 1M
- -38.20%
- YTD
- -22.96%
- 6M
- 56.75%
- 1Y
- 158.90%
- 3Y*
- 56.41%
- 5Y*
- 22.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.30%
GLDU.TO
- 1D
- 7.62%
- 1M
- -24.09%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 6M
- 30.90%
- 1Y
- 88.74%
- 3Y*
- 51.18%
- 5Y*
- 28.50%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGQ vs. GLDU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGQ has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDU.TO's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AGQ vs. GLDU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AGQ
GLDU.TO
AGQ vs. GLDU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGQ | GLDU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 1.56 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 1.96 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.28 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 2.34 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | 8.06 | -2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGQ | GLDU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.56 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.75 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.47 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.24 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between AGQ and GLDU.TO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AGQ vs. GLDU.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither AGQ nor GLDU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AGQ vs. GLDU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGQ drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, which is greater than GLDU.TO's maximum drawdown of -84.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQ and GLDU.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGQ | GLDU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.16% | -77.99% | -20.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.21% | -38.13% | -38.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.21% | -41.18% | -35.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.25% | -49.01% | -27.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.64% | -28.76% | -54.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.82% | -49.03% | -30.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.99% | 11.33% | +16.66% |
Volatility
AGQ vs. GLDU.TO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a higher volatility of 38.31% compared to BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO) at 22.26%. This indicates that AGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGQ | GLDU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.31% | 22.26% | +16.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 132.42% | 49.81% | +82.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 117.89% | 57.35% | +60.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.03% | 38.46% | +34.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.68% | 34.89% | +29.79% |