AGQ vs. 3GDX.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L).

AGQ and 3GDX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Silver (200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. 3GDX.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Dec 10, 2021.

Performance

AGQ vs. 3GDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AGQ vs. 3GDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver	-23.34%	360.71%	23.92%	-15.09%	-7.89%	12.46%
3GDX.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC	1.78%	723.93%	-17.15%	-19.21%	-52.89%	16.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGQ achieves a -23.34% return, which is significantly lower than 3GDX.L's 1.78% return.

AGQ

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -32.70%
• YTD: -23.34%
• 6M: 51.96%
• 1Y: 163.54%
• 3Y*: 56.15%
• 5Y*: 22.66%
• 10Y*: 14.25%

3GDX.L

• 1D: 22.50%
• 1M: -45.15%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: 17.27%
• 1Y: 278.66%
• 3Y*: 65.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGQ vs. 3GDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGQ has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than 3GDX.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

AGQ

ProShares Ultra Silver

3GDX.L

Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC

Return for Risk

AGQ vs. 3GDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGQ

AGQ Risk / Return Rank: 73
AGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
AGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
AGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55

3GDX.L

3GDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
3GDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
3GDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
3GDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
3GDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
3GDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGQ vs. 3GDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AGQ	3GDX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	2.09	-0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	2.43	-0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.33	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	4.20	-2.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.57	11.69	-6.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AGQ vs. 3GDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the 3GDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGQ and 3GDX.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGQ	3GDX.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	2.09	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.29	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between AGQ and 3GDX.L is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AGQ vs. 3GDX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AGQ nor 3GDX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AGQ vs. 3GDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGQ drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, which is greater than 3GDX.L's maximum drawdown of -89.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQ and 3GDX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGQ	3GDX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.16%	-89.13%	-9.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.21%	-69.66%	-6.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.72%	-50.54%	-33.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-79.83%	-60.70%	-19.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.27%	25.00%	+3.27%

Volatility

AGQ vs. 3GDX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) is 34.37%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L) has a volatility of 55.66%. This indicates that AGQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3GDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGQ	3GDX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.37%	55.66%	-21.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	132.42%	112.43%	+19.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	117.90%	132.29%	-14.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.01%	104.76%	-31.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.67%	104.76%	-40.09%