PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGOX vs. QMNNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AGOX vs. QMNNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AGOX vs. QMNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AGOX
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
-5.64%8.58%15.97%19.07%-19.21%9.82%
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N
-3.52%26.19%25.43%16.30%27.07%-3.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGOX achieves a -5.64% return, which is significantly lower than QMNNX's -3.52% return.


AGOX

1D
1.24%
1M
-7.61%
YTD
-5.64%
6M
-9.89%
1Y
14.13%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
10Y*

QMNNX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.43%
YTD
-3.52%
6M
1.87%
1Y
10.76%
3Y*
20.68%
5Y*
18.37%
10Y*
6.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGOX vs. QMNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGOX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is lower than QMNNX's 5.28% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AGOX vs. QMNNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGOX
AGOX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

QMNNX
QMNNX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QMNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QMNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGOX vs. QMNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGOXQMNNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.77

-1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.08

2.40

-1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.33

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.06

-1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.26

5.15

-1.89

AGOX vs. QMNNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the QMNNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGOX and QMNNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGOXQMNNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.77

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.87

-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between AGOX and QMNNX is -0.12. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

AGOX vs. QMNNX - Dividend Comparison

AGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than QMNNX's 1.30% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGOX
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
3.42%3.23%3.94%0.27%0.20%6.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N
1.30%1.26%6.06%21.67%5.77%1.41%17.64%3.86%0.49%3.37%1.19%2.51%

Drawdowns

AGOX vs. QMNNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGOX drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, smaller than the maximum QMNNX drawdown of -39.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGOX and QMNNX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AGOXQMNNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.93%

-39.22%

+12.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.32%

-5.47%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.44%

-3.92%

-7.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-10.67%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

2.19%

+2.03%

Volatility

AGOX vs. QMNNX - Volatility Comparison

Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) at 1.36%. This indicates that AGOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AGOXQMNNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

1.36%

+5.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

4.07%

+8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.33%

6.29%

+16.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

9.53%

+9.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

8.23%

+11.03%