AGNG vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
AGNG and QYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGNG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index. It was launched on May 9, 2016. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. Both AGNG and QYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AGNG vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGNG vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | 0.54% | 20.01% | 7.03% | 9.65% | -8.61% | 3.91% | 18.96% | 25.24% | -1.45% | 28.17% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 0.61% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGNG achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 0.61% return.
AGNG
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 17.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGNG vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGNG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AGNG vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
AGNG
QYLD
AGNG vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGNG | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.00 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 1.61 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.31 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.57 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 10.32 | -4.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGNG | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.00 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.47 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.56 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between AGNG and QYLD is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AGNG vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
AGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than QYLD's 11.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | 0.87% | 0.88% | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.49% | 0.72% | 0.36% | 0.83% | 1.00% | 1.04% | 0.45% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.85% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Drawdowns
AGNG vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGNG drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGNG and QYLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGNG | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.58% | -24.75% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.16% | -10.84% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -24.61% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.11% | -1.84% | -4.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -3.89% | -2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 1.65% | +1.33% |
Volatility
AGNG vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.90%. This indicates that AGNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGNG | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 4.90% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 7.50% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | 16.43% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 14.84% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 15.51% | +1.66% |