AGNC vs. UTF
AGNC (AGNC Investment Corp.) and UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) are both stocks. AGNC operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate), while UTF operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, AGNC returned 6.25%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for UTF. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AGNC vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGNC achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 15.84% return. Over the past 10 years, AGNC has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 6.25%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.
AGNC
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 3.01%
- 1Y
- 27.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.42%
- 10Y*
- 6.25%
UTF
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 18.47%
- 1Y
- 12.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
AGNC vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNC AGNC Investment Corp. | -0.32% | 34.92% | 8.90% | 10.14% | -21.65% | 5.20% | -1.78% | 13.31% | -2.46% | 23.73% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 15.84% | 9.93% | 22.37% | -3.83% | -9.60% | 17.91% | 6.93% | 42.74% | -9.87% | 34.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGNC and UTF is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2008 | 0.32 |
The correlation between AGNC and UTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AGNC:
$11.35B
UTF:
$2.62B
AGNC:
$1.33
UTF:
$6.79
AGNC:
7.60
UTF:
3.99
AGNC:
0.02
UTF:
0.03
AGNC:
4.66
UTF:
6.78
AGNC:
1.11
UTF:
0.92
AGNC:
$2.33B
UTF:
$387.16M
AGNC:
$2.30B
UTF:
$388.42M
AGNC:
$3.72B
UTF:
$765.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGNC vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank
AGNC
UTF
AGNC vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGNC | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.18 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.22 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 2.49 | +1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGNC | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.02 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.36 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.49 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.45 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
AGNC vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGNC drawdown since its inception was -54.56%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGNC and UTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGNC | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.56% | -72.62% | +18.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.71% | -10.33% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.04% | -21.06% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.36% | -30.28% | -24.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.56% | -52.53% | -2.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.19% | -0.62% | -11.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.56% | -10.37% | -3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.30% | 5.05% | +1.25% |
Volatility
AGNC vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 2.67%. This indicates that AGNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGNC | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 2.67% | +2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.96% | 8.39% | +7.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 12.38% | +7.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 18.33% | +7.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.39% | 23.36% | +2.03% |
Dividends
AGNC vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
AGNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.24%, more than UTF's 6.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNC AGNC Investment Corp. | 14.24% | 13.43% | 15.64% | 14.68% | 13.91% | 9.57% | 10.00% | 11.31% | 12.31% | 10.70% | 12.69% | 14.30% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 6.90% | 7.62% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% |
Financials
AGNC vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AGNC Investment Corp. and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AGNC and UTF have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGNC has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to UTF (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGNC dropped -54.56% vs UTF's -72.62%.
AGNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGNC and UTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer