PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGNC vs. KRP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AGNC vs. KRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGNC achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than KRP's 32.35% return.


AGNC

1D
0.78%
1M
2.43%
YTD
2.35%
6M
4.08%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
6.33%

KRP

1D
-0.20%
1M
-2.31%
YTD
32.35%
6M
37.01%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGNC vs. KRP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
2.35%34.92%8.90%10.14%-21.65%5.20%-1.78%13.31%-2.46%18.00%
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
32.35%-18.60%20.43%0.76%36.93%89.97%-48.94%38.62%-8.93%-5.43%

Correlation

The correlation between AGNC and KRP is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017

0.17

The correlation between AGNC and KRP shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AGNC:

$11.65B

KRP:

$1.76B

EPS

AGNC:

$1.33

KRP:

$0.60

PE Ratio

AGNC:

7.80

KRP:

24.59

PEG Ratio

AGNC:

0.02

KRP:

0.09

PS Ratio

AGNC:

4.79

KRP:

5.71

PB Ratio

AGNC:

1.14

KRP:

3.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGNC:

$2.33B

KRP:

$309.11M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGNC:

$2.30B

KRP:

$319.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

AGNC:

$3.72B

KRP:

$177.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGNC vs. KRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGNC
AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

KRP
KRP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
KRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
KRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGNC vs. KRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGNCKRPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.11

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

0.62

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

1.58

+2.86

AGNC vs. KRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGNC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the KRP Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGNC and KRP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGNC vs. KRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGNC drawdown since its inception was -54.56%, smaller than the maximum KRP drawdown of -80.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGNC and KRP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGNCKRPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.56%

-80.91%

+26.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.71%

-20.50%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.04%

-27.58%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.65%

-27.58%

-23.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.85%

-4.95%

-4.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-19.37%

+5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

7.97%

-1.43%

Volatility

AGNC vs. KRP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) is 5.55%, while Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that AGNC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGNCKRPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

6.60%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.28%

16.81%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.58%

23.01%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.74%

28.34%

-2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.41%

41.29%

-15.88%

Dividends

AGNC vs. KRP - Dividend Comparison

AGNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.87%, more than KRP's 10.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
13.87%13.43%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
10.22%13.61%10.78%11.50%11.26%8.36%11.00%9.29%12.22%5.17%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AGNC vs. KRP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AGNC Investment Corp. and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B3.00B202220232024202520260
65.54M
(AGNC) Total Revenue
(KRP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AGNC and KRP have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KRP has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to AGNC (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGNC dropped -54.56% vs KRP's -80.91%.

AGNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGNC and KRP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer