AGMI vs. MNS.TO
AGMI (Themes Silver Miners ETF) and MNS.TO (Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves) are both Silver funds - AGMI tracks the STOXX Global Silver Mining Index while MNS.TO tracks the N/A (Physical Bullion). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AGMI returned 77.19% vs 59.09% for MNS.TO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AGMI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MNS.TO.
Performance
AGMI vs. MNS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AGMI is traded in USD, while MNS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the MNS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGMI achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly higher than MNS.TO's -25.76% return.
AGMI
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -15.37%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -6.87%
- 1Y
- 77.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNS.TO
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -20.90%
- YTD
- -25.76%
- 6M
- -29.21%
- 1Y
- 59.09%
- 3Y*
- 39.00%
- 5Y*
- 16.91%
- 10Y*
- —
AGMI vs. MNS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF | -5.19% | 176.11% | -0.74% |
MNS.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves | -25.76% | 173.61% | 8.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGMI and MNS.TO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between AGMI and MNS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGMI vs. MNS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AGMI
MNS.TO
AGMI vs. MNS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGMI | MNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 1.20 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | 2.80 | +2.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGMI vs. MNS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGMI drawdown since its inception was -34.40%, smaller than the maximum MNS.TO drawdown of -49.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGMI and MNS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGMI | MNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.40% | -49.67% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.40% | -49.67% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.58% | -45.50% | +13.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -17.27% | +7.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | 21.13% | -6.62% |
Volatility
AGMI vs. MNS.TO - Volatility Comparison
Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) has a higher volatility of 19.24% compared to Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) at 14.87%. This indicates that AGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGMI | MNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.24% | 14.87% | +4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.02% | 52.95% | -8.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.85% | 56.45% | -4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.98% | 35.25% | +9.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.98% | 31.97% | +13.01% |
AGMI vs. MNS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MNS.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGMI vs. MNS.TO - Dividend Comparison
AGMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, while MNS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF | 4.67% | 4.43% | 1.81% |
MNS.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGMI and MNS.TO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MNS.TO.
AGMI tracks STOXX Global Silver Mining Index, while MNS.TO tracks N/A (Physical Bullion). They also come from different issuers: Themes and Royal Canadian Mint. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AGMI and 0.45% for MNS.TO.
Find the right allocation for AGMI and MNS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer