PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGM vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AGM vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGM achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, AGM has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 21.91%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.95% annualized return.


AGM

1D
0.41%
1M
3.64%
YTD
4.83%
6M
1.90%
1Y
1.50%
3Y*
10.01%
5Y*
15.52%
10Y*
21.91%

NVDA

1D
0.16%
1M
-12.86%
YTD
10.16%
6M
17.38%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
71.13%
5Y*
63.13%
10Y*
67.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGM vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
4.83%-7.96%6.08%74.61%-5.83%72.62%-6.60%43.16%-20.38%39.64%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.16%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AGM and NVDA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999

0.22

The correlation between AGM and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AGM:

$24.06

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

AGM:

7.57

NVDA:

31.44

PEG Ratio

AGM:

0.56

NVDA:

0.17

PS Ratio

AGM:

1.18

NVDA:

19.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGM:

$1.35B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGM:

$295.93M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

AGM:

$192.59M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGM vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGM
AGM Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGM Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGM Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGM vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGMNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.21

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

2.07

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

4.94

-5.08

AGM vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGM Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGM and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGM vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGM drawdown since its inception was -94.63%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGM and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGMNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.63%

-89.72%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.94%

-20.21%

-11.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.54%

-36.88%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.54%

-66.34%

+33.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.30%

-66.34%

+13.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.62%

-12.86%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.85%

-36.18%

+8.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.93%

8.46%

+8.47%

Volatility

AGM vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is 9.43%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that AGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGMNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.43%

13.26%

-3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.30%

26.67%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.34%

35.00%

-2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.00%

51.76%

-21.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.55%

49.84%

-15.29%

Dividends

AGM vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

AGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
3.35%3.42%2.84%2.30%3.37%2.84%4.31%3.35%3.84%1.84%1.82%2.03%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

AGM vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
415.96M
81.62B
(AGM) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AGM vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
74.9%
Portfolio components
AGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 415.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

AGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 415.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

AGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 51.83M and revenue of 415.96M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AGM and NVDA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to AGM (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGM dropped -94.63% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGM and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer