AGM vs. R
AGM (Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation) and R (Ryder System, Inc.) are both stocks. AGM operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while R operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, AGM returned 23.70%/yr vs 18.64%/yr for R. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AGM vs. R - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGM achieves a 32.18% return, which is significantly lower than R's 35.08% return. Over the past 10 years, AGM has outperformed R with an annualized return of 23.70%, while R has yielded a comparatively lower 18.64% annualized return.
AGM
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- 13.27%
- 6M
- 37.07%
- YTD
- 32.18%
- 1Y
- 38.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 22.35%
- 10Y*
- 23.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.01%
R
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 35.16%
- YTD
- 35.08%
- 1Y
- 50.34%
- 3Y*
- 39.19%
- 5Y*
- 30.68%
- 10Y*
- 18.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.71M | $26.87M | $25.58M | |
| $108.70M | $97.25M | $102.35M |
AGM vs. R - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | 32.18% | -7.96% | 6.08% | 74.61% | -5.83% | 72.62% | -6.60% | 43.16% | -20.38% | 39.64% |
R Ryder System, Inc. | 35.08% | 24.53% | 39.51% | 41.61% | 4.38% | 37.59% | 20.15% | 17.42% | -41.03% | 15.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGM and R is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.32 |
The correlation between AGM and R shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AGM:
$2.47B
R:
$9.83B
AGM:
$24.02
R:
$12.33
AGM:
9.48
R:
20.80
AGM:
0.70
R:
1.42
AGM:
1.49
R:
0.80
AGM:
$1.40B
R:
$12.85B
AGM:
$305.82M
R:
$2.43B
AGM:
$198.60M
R:
$2.60B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGM vs. R — Risk / Return Rank
AGM
R
AGM vs. R - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) and Ryder System, Inc. (R). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGM | R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 2.70 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.24 | 7.17 | -4.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGM vs. R - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGM drawdown since its inception was -94.63%, which is greater than R's maximum drawdown of -74.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGM and R.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGM | R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.63% | -74.02% | -20.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.94% | -17.52% | -14.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.54% | -23.86% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.54% | -29.97% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.30% | -72.26% | +18.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.53% | +8.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.75% | -22.45% | -5.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.51% | 6.58% | +9.93% |
Volatility
AGM vs. R - Volatility Comparison
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to Ryder System, Inc. (R) at 7.52%. This indicates that AGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than R based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGM | R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.91% | 7.52% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.67% | 25.30% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.05% | 33.51% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.00% | 32.90% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.49% | 36.46% | -1.97% |
Dividends
AGM vs. R - Dividend Comparison
AGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than R's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | 2.72% | 3.42% | 2.84% | 2.30% | 3.37% | 2.84% | 4.31% | 3.35% | 3.84% | 1.84% | 1.82% | 2.03% |
R Ryder System, Inc. | 1.42% | 1.80% | 1.94% | 2.31% | 2.87% | 2.77% | 3.63% | 4.05% | 4.40% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 2.75% |
Financials
AGM vs. R - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and Ryder System, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AGM vs. R - Profitability Comparison
AGM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 450.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
R - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported a gross profit of 523.00M and revenue of 3.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.6%.
AGM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 450.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
R - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported an operating income of 133.00M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
AGM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 58.88M and revenue of 450.26M, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
R - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported a net income of 133.00M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGM and R have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGM has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to R (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGM dropped -94.63% vs R's -74.02%.
R currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGM and R
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer