PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGM vs. DDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AGM vs. DDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) and Dillard's, Inc. (DDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGM achieves a 32.18% return, which is significantly higher than DDS's -2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, AGM has underperformed DDS with an annualized return of 23.70%, while DDS has yielded a comparatively higher 29.15% annualized return.


AGM

1D
3.31%
1M
13.27%
6M
37.07%
YTD
32.18%
1Y
38.47%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
22.35%
10Y*
23.70%
ALL TIME*
20.01%

DDS

1D
-2.32%
1M
7.61%
6M
-2.97%
YTD
-2.78%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
25.91%
5Y*
32.83%
10Y*
29.15%
ALL TIME*
11.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.71M$26.87M$25.58M
$75.11M$68.81M$70.32M

AGM vs. DDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
32.18%-7.96%6.08%74.61%-5.83%72.62%-6.60%43.16%-20.38%39.64%
DDS
Dillard's, Inc.
-2.78%46.81%13.47%32.05%38.66%306.41%-12.71%22.76%0.97%-3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between AGM and DDS is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.27

The correlation between AGM and DDS shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AGM:

$2.47B

DDS:

$9.19B

EPS

AGM:

$24.02

DDS:

$42.07

PE Ratio

AGM:

9.48

DDS:

13.98

PS Ratio

AGM:

1.49

DDS:

1.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGM:

$1.40B

DDS:

$6.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGM:

$305.82M

DDS:

$1.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

AGM:

$198.60M

DDS:

$985.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGM vs. DDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AGM
AGM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

DDS
DDS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDS Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AGM vs. DDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) and Dillard's, Inc. (DDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGMDDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.17

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

1.18

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

2.50

-0.26

AGM vs. DDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGM Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the DDS Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGM and DDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGM vs. DDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGM drawdown since its inception was -94.63%, roughly equal to the maximum DDS drawdown of -93.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGM and DDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGMDDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.63%

-93.62%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.94%

-27.04%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.54%

-42.02%

+9.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.54%

-49.71%

+17.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.30%

-76.57%

+23.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-15.82%

+15.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.75%

-35.56%

+7.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.51%

12.78%

+3.73%

Volatility

AGM vs. DDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is 7.91%, while Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) has a volatility of 10.82%. This indicates that AGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGMDDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

10.82%

-2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.67%

27.45%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.05%

39.97%

-8.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.00%

50.21%

-20.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.49%

59.66%

-25.17%

Dividends

AGM vs. DDS - Dividend Comparison

AGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than DDS's 5.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
2.72%3.42%2.84%2.30%3.37%2.84%4.31%3.35%3.84%1.84%1.82%2.03%
DDS
Dillard's, Inc.
5.38%5.13%6.02%5.18%4.89%6.41%0.95%0.68%0.66%0.57%0.45%0.40%

Financials

AGM vs. DDS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and Dillard's, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

AGM vs. DDS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and Dillard's, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

AGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 450.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 450.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

DDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 58.88M and revenue of 450.26M, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.

DDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported a net income of 250.60M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AGM and DDS have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDS has higher volatility (10.82%) compared to AGM (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGM dropped -94.63% vs DDS's -93.62%.

AGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGM and DDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer