PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGM vs. BLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AGM vs. BLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) and Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGM achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly higher than BLDR's -26.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AGM having a 22.02% annualized return and BLDR not far behind at 21.27%.


AGM

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.78%
YTD
6.40%
6M
5.39%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
17.18%
10Y*
22.02%

BLDR

1D
-3.30%
1M
8.49%
YTD
-26.00%
6M
-26.44%
1Y
-29.49%
3Y*
-14.40%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
21.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGM vs. BLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
6.40%-7.96%6.08%74.61%-5.83%72.62%-6.60%43.16%-20.38%39.64%
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
-26.00%-28.01%-14.38%157.31%-24.30%110.02%60.61%132.91%-49.93%98.63%

Correlation

The correlation between AGM and BLDR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2005

0.38

Fundamentals

EPS

AGM:

$24.06

BLDR:

$2.63

PE Ratio

AGM:

7.62

BLDR:

28.92

PS Ratio

AGM:

1.18

BLDR:

0.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGM:

$1.35B

BLDR:

$14.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGM:

$295.93M

BLDR:

$4.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

AGM:

$192.59M

BLDR:

$1.06B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGM vs. BLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGM
AGM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
AGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGM Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGM Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BLDR
BLDR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGM vs. BLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) and Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGMBLDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.92

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

-0.53

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.17

-0.99

+1.16

AGM vs. BLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGM Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is higher than the BLDR Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGM and BLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGM vs. BLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGM drawdown since its inception was -94.63%, roughly equal to the maximum BLDR drawdown of -96.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGM and BLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGMBLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.63%

-96.78%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.94%

-55.51%

+23.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.54%

-68.55%

+36.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.54%

-68.55%

+36.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.30%

-68.55%

+15.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.30%

-63.94%

+53.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.85%

-47.88%

+20.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.95%

29.69%

-12.74%

Volatility

AGM vs. BLDR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is 9.10%, while Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) has a volatility of 14.68%. This indicates that AGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGMBLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.10%

14.68%

-5.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.30%

34.73%

-9.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.11%

48.46%

-16.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.01%

45.32%

-15.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.53%

47.76%

-13.23%

Dividends

AGM vs. BLDR - Dividend Comparison

AGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, while BLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
3.38%3.42%2.84%2.30%3.37%2.84%4.31%3.35%3.84%1.84%1.82%2.03%
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AGM vs. BLDR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and Builders FirstSource, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
415.96M
3.29B
(AGM) Total Revenue
(BLDR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AGM vs. BLDR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and Builders FirstSource, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
28.3%
Portfolio components
AGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 415.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BLDR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported a gross profit of 928.97M and revenue of 3.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.

AGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 415.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

BLDR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.52M and revenue of 3.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

AGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 51.83M and revenue of 415.96M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.

BLDR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported a net income of -47.41M and revenue of 3.29B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AGM and BLDR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLDR has higher volatility (14.68%) compared to AGM (9.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGM dropped -94.63% vs BLDR's -96.78%.

AGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGM and BLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer