AGI.TO vs. K.TO
AGI.TO (Alamos Gold Inc.) and K.TO (Kinross Gold Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, AGI.TO returned 18.20%/yr vs 19.71%/yr for K.TO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AGI.TO vs. K.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AGI.TO having a -7.00% return and K.TO slightly lower at -7.26%. Over the past 10 years, AGI.TO has underperformed K.TO with an annualized return of 18.20%, while K.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.71% annualized return.
AGI.TO
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -7.00%
- 6M
- -6.98%
- 1Y
- 31.91%
- 3Y*
- 44.75%
- 5Y*
- 36.71%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
K.TO
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -15.56%
- YTD
- -7.26%
- 6M
- -6.78%
- 1Y
- 67.56%
- 3Y*
- 79.11%
- 5Y*
- 32.58%
- 10Y*
- 19.71%
AGI.TO vs. K.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI.TO Alamos Gold Inc. | -7.00% | 100.53% | 49.72% | 31.24% | 42.36% | -11.61% | 43.39% | 60.33% | -39.87% | -11.35% |
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | -7.26% | 191.80% | 69.08% | 49.14% | -22.75% | -20.24% | 52.79% | 40.00% | -18.82% | 29.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGI.TO and K.TO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.67 |
The correlation between AGI.TO and K.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.80 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AGI.TO:
CA$20.75B
K.TO:
CA$43.06B
AGI.TO:
$2.52
K.TO:
$2.36
AGI.TO:
13.99
K.TO:
10.83
AGI.TO:
0.09
K.TO:
0.14
AGI.TO:
7.19
K.TO:
3.90
AGI.TO:
3.22
K.TO:
3.39
AGI.TO:
$2.07B
K.TO:
$7.97B
AGI.TO:
$1.22B
K.TO:
$4.26B
AGI.TO:
$1.43B
K.TO:
$5.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGI.TO vs. K.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AGI.TO
K.TO
AGI.TO vs. K.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGI.TO | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.25 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 1.94 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 5.71 | -3.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGI.TO vs. K.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGI.TO drawdown since its inception was -82.90%, smaller than the maximum K.TO drawdown of -92.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGI.TO and K.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGI.TO | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.90% | -92.37% | +9.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.20% | -36.29% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.20% | -36.29% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.20% | -56.26% | +17.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.57% | -68.36% | -2.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.84% | -30.94% | -3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.23% | -55.98% | +20.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.78% | 12.29% | +1.49% |
Volatility
AGI.TO vs. K.TO - Volatility Comparison
Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) have volatilities of 17.49% and 18.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGI.TO | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.49% | 18.19% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.60% | 39.35% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.32% | 50.98% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.36% | 42.47% | -3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.80% | 45.61% | +1.19% |
Dividends
AGI.TO vs. K.TO - Dividend Comparison
AGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than K.TO's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI.TO Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.37% | 0.26% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 1.03% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.41% | 0.29% | 0.22% | 0.88% |
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.56% | 0.45% | 1.23% | 2.04% | 2.68% | 1.63% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AGI.TO vs. K.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamos Gold Inc. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AGI.TO vs. K.TO - Profitability Comparison
AGI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 375.05M and revenue of 586.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.
K.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.44B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.
AGI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 336.79M and revenue of 586.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.4%.
K.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.33B and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
AGI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 188.26M and revenue of 586.92M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.
K.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 843.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGI.TO and K.TO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AGI.TO and K.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer