AGGS vs. BNDP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AGGS (Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF) and BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. AGGS is actively managed, while BNDP is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AGGS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDP.

Performance

AGGS vs. BNDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF (AGGS) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGGS achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than BNDP's 0.42% return.

AGGS

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 0.65%
• 1Y: 5.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNDP

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.59%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGGS vs. BNDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AGGS Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF	0.50%	-0.06%
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF	0.42%	0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between AGGS and BNDP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

AGGS vs. BNDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGGS

AGGS Risk / Return Rank: 37
AGGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
AGGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
AGGS Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AGGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
AGGS Martin Ratio Rank: 35

BNDP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGGS vs. BNDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF (AGGS) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AGGS	BNDP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.16	—	—

Drawdowns

AGGS vs. BNDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGGS drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, which is greater than BNDP's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGS and BNDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGGS	BNDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	-2.60%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-1.23%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.18%	-0.89%	-0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AGGS	BNDP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.92%	3.71%	+0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.65%	3.71%	+0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.65%	3.71%	+0.94%

AGGS vs. BNDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGGS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDP's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

AGGS vs. BNDP - Dividend Comparison

AGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than BNDP's 2.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AGGS Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF	5.20%	5.43%	3.38%
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF	2.08%	0.24%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGGS and BNDP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, AGGS and BNDP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, AGGS or BNDP?

On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGGS or BNDP?

BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AGGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AGGS or BNDP?

AGGS has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 2.08% for BNDP.

What is the main difference between AGGS and BNDP?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AGGS and 0.05% for BNDP.