AGGS vs. EUSB
AGGS (Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF) and EUSB (iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. AGGS is actively managed, while EUSB is passively managed. Over the past year, AGGS returned 4.93% vs 4.36% for EUSB. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AGGS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUSB.
Performance
AGGS vs. EUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGGS achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than EUSB's 0.35% return.
AGGS
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUSB
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
AGGS vs. EUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AGGS Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF | 0.55% | 7.40% | 4.56% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 0.35% | 7.45% | 4.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGGS and EUSB is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between AGGS and EUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGGS vs. EUSB — Risk / Return Rank
AGGS
EUSB
AGGS vs. EUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF (AGGS) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGGS | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 1.77 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 5.02 | -0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGGS vs. EUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGGS drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum EUSB drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGS and EUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGGS | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -17.87% | +13.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -2.48% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -1.15% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.18% | -6.45% | +5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 0.87% | +0.13% |
Volatility
AGGS vs. EUSB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF (AGGS) is 0.87%, while iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that AGGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGGS | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 0.99% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 2.57% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91% | 3.50% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 5.78% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 5.40% | -0.75% |
AGGS vs. EUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGGS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSB's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGGS vs. EUSB - Dividend Comparison
AGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than EUSB's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGS Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF | 5.20% | 5.43% | 3.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.84% | 3.67% | 3.08% | 2.21% | 1.10% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGGS and EUSB have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EUSB has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to AGGS (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGGS dropped -4.66% vs EUSB's -17.87%.
On 1-year performance, AGGS leads with 4.93% vs 4.36% for EUSB. On fees, EUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, AGGS has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AGGS has performed better with a 4.93% return vs 4.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AGGS.
AGGS has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 3.96% for EUSB.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AGGS and 0.12% for EUSB.
AGGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGGS and EUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer