AGGG.L vs. IGLN.L
AGGG.L (iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist) and IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - AGGG.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while IGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AGGG.L returned -1.74%/yr vs 18.61%/yr for IGLN.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AGGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IGLN.L.
Performance
AGGG.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGGG.L achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than IGLN.L's 3.70% return.
AGGG.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 2.20%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- -1.74%
- 10Y*
- —
IGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- 1Y
- 32.37%
- 3Y*
- 31.55%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
AGGG.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist | -0.28% | 8.06% | -1.44% | 5.27% | -15.93% | -5.32% | 9.37% | 6.85% | -1.17% | 0.03% |
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 3.70% | 64.92% | 26.14% | 13.44% | -0.09% | -4.03% | 24.16% | 18.28% | -1.31% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGGG.L and IGLN.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2017 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGGG.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
AGGG.L
IGLN.L
AGGG.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGGG.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.25 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 1.86 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 4.79 | -3.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGGG.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 1.30 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 1.07 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.46 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
AGGG.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.91%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -45.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGG.L and IGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGGG.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.91% | -45.24% | +19.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.48% | -17.36% | +13.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.20% | -17.36% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.24% | -21.15% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.01% | -15.66% | +4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -19.80% | +10.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 6.74% | -5.42% |
Volatility
AGGG.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L) is 1.74%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that AGGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGGG.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | 6.36% | -4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.91% | 21.73% | -17.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.10% | 24.78% | -19.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.81% | 17.36% | -10.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 15.54% | -9.22% |
AGGG.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AGGG.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
AGGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, while IGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist | 3.16% | 2.97% | 2.74% | 2.01% | 1.55% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.62% | 0.96% |
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGGG.L and IGLN.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IGLN.L.
AGGG.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while IGLN.L is Gold. AGGG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for AGGG.L and 0.25% for IGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for AGGG.L and IGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer