AGGG.L vs. AGGU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L).
AGGG.L and AGGU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGGG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. It was launched on Nov 21, 2017. AGGU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Nov 21, 2017. Both AGGG.L and AGGU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AGGG.L or AGGU.L.
Key characteristics
| AGGG.L | AGGU.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.68% | -0.35% |
| 1Y Return | 1.12% | 3.61% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.49% | -1.74% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -1.39% | 0.31% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.12 | 0.78 |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.88% | 4.63% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.91% | -15.55% |
| Current Drawdown | -18.45% | -7.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGGG.L and AGGU.L is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AGGG.L vs. AGGU.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AGGG.L achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly lower than AGGU.L's -0.35% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGGG.L vs. AGGU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AGGG.L and AGGU.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AGGG.L vs. AGGU.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AGGG.L vs. AGGU.L - Dividend Comparison
AGGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, while AGGU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist | 2.48% | 2.01% | 1.55% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.62% | 0.96% |
AGGU.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AGGG.L vs. AGGU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.91%, which is greater than AGGU.L's maximum drawdown of -15.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGG.L and AGGU.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AGGG.L vs. AGGU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.82% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L) at 1.16%. This indicates that AGGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.