AGD vs. ACP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AGD (abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund) and ACP (abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund) are both mutual funds - AGD is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by abrdn, while ACP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by abrdn. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, AGD returned 13.34%/yr vs 6.06%/yr for ACP. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AGD charges 1.14%/yr vs 1.97%/yr for ACP.

Performance

AGD vs. ACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD) and abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGD achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly higher than ACP's 4.22% return. Over the past 10 years, AGD has outperformed ACP with an annualized return of 13.34%, while ACP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.06% annualized return.

AGD

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 3.19%
• YTD: 13.13%
• 6M: 14.59%
• 1Y: 36.12%
• 3Y*: 23.04%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: 13.34%

ACP

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: 4.22%
• 6M: 5.53%
• 1Y: 6.60%
• 3Y*: 9.43%
• 5Y*: -0.18%
• 10Y*: 6.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGD vs. ACP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AGD abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund	13.13%	34.31%	16.39%	7.36%	-15.31%	23.74%	9.49%	32.49%	-14.98%	33.04%
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund	4.22%	6.48%	4.81%	19.27%	-22.87%	6.65%	7.51%	26.93%	-17.64%	15.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AGD and ACP is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011	0.39

Return for Risk

AGD vs. ACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGD

AGD Risk / Return Rank: 23
AGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
AGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
AGD Omega Ratio Rank: 34
AGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
AGD Martin Ratio Rank: 13

ACP

ACP Risk / Return Rank: 7
ACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
ACP Omega Ratio Rank: 7
ACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
ACP Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGD vs. ACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD) and abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AGD	ACP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	0.58	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	0.89	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.11	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	0.63	+1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.85	1.82	+2.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AGD vs. ACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the ACP Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGD and ACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGD	ACP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	0.58	+0.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	-0.01	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.29	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.20	-0.02

Drawdowns

AGD vs. ACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGD drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than ACP's maximum drawdown of -51.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGD and ACP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGD	ACP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.36%	-51.03%	-25.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.25%	-10.51%	-9.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.25%	-18.97%	-1.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.16%	-38.83%	+10.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.12%	-51.03%	+6.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.16%	-6.47%	+4.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.90%	-11.12%	-18.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.42%	3.64%	+5.78%

Volatility

AGD vs. ACP - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD) and abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGD	ACP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	4.35%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.32%	9.33%	+6.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.88%	11.40%	+12.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.98%	17.06%	+1.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.60%	21.08%	-1.48%

AGD vs. ACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGD has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ACP's 1.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

AGD vs. ACP - Dividend Comparison

AGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.07%, less than ACP's 17.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund	17.71%	17.19%	19.72%	17.65%	17.70%	11.76%	12.73%	12.27%	12.60%	10.26%	10.72%	12.69%
AGD abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund	11.07%	11.41%	10.46%	8.35%	8.25%	6.45%	7.47%	7.50%	9.17%	7.22%	8.89%	8.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGD and ACP in my portfolio?

AGD and ACP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AGD or ACP?

ACP has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to AGD (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGD dropped -76.36% vs ACP's -51.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.