AGD vs. ACP
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD) and abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP).
AGD is an actively managed fund by abrdn. It was launched on May 11, 2006. ACP is an actively managed fund by abrdn. It was launched on Jan 27, 2011.
Performance
AGD vs. ACP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGD vs. ACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGD abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund | -4.61% | 34.31% | 16.39% | 7.36% | -15.31% | 23.74% | 9.49% | 32.49% | -14.98% | 33.04% |
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund | -1.66% | 6.48% | 4.81% | 19.27% | -22.87% | 6.65% | 7.51% | 26.93% | -17.64% | 15.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGD achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly lower than ACP's -1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, AGD has outperformed ACP with an annualized return of 11.71%, while ACP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.58% annualized return.
AGD
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- -12.28%
- YTD
- -4.61%
- 6M
- -13.97%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
ACP
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- -1.66%
- 6M
- -4.24%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGD vs. ACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGD has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ACP's 1.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AGD vs. ACP — Risk / Return Rank
AGD
ACP
AGD vs. ACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD) and abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGD | ACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.14 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 0.28 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.04 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.15 | +0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.42 | 0.48 | +1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGD | ACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.14 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | -0.04 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.31 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.18 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between AGD and ACP is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AGD vs. ACP - Dividend Comparison
AGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.59%, less than ACP's 18.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGD abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund | 12.59% | 11.41% | 10.46% | 8.35% | 8.25% | 6.45% | 7.47% | 7.50% | 9.17% | 7.22% | 8.89% | 8.77% |
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund | 18.24% | 17.19% | 19.72% | 17.65% | 17.70% | 11.76% | 12.73% | 12.27% | 12.60% | 10.26% | 10.72% | 12.69% |
Drawdowns
AGD vs. ACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGD drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than ACP's maximum drawdown of -51.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGD and ACP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGD | ACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.36% | -51.03% | -25.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.25% | -12.07% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.16% | -40.97% | +12.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.12% | -51.03% | +6.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.50% | -11.74% | -5.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -11.17% | -18.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.03% | 3.75% | +5.28% |
Volatility
AGD vs. ACP - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD) has a higher volatility of 10.91% compared to abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP) at 5.12%. This indicates that AGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGD | ACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.91% | 5.12% | +5.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.01% | 9.06% | +12.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 15.09% | +10.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 17.63% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 21.03% | -1.50% |