AFTY vs. CQQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AFTY (Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF) and CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) are both China Equities funds - AFTY tracks the FTSE China A 50 while CQQQ tracks the AlphaShares China Technology Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.70% expense ratio.

Performance

AFTY vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AFTY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CQQQ

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: 4.43%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 5.43%
• 1Y: 32.76%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: -7.50%
• 10Y*: 5.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFTY vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	20.48%	-12.80%	-22.47%	-7.37%	33.77%	44.23%	-24.26%	45.15%
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.46%	34.96%	9.84%	-16.71%	-30.09%	-24.54%	57.33%	33.57%	-34.77%	74.31%

Correlation

The correlation between AFTY and CQQQ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015	0.59

The correlation between AFTY and CQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.59 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AFTY vs. CQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AFTY	CQQQ
Financial Services	50.4%	0.1%
Basic Materials	15.5%	0.1%
Energy	11.5%	-
Technology	7.4%	58.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	-
Industrials	4.7%	1.3%
Utilities	4.4%	-
Communication Services	-	21.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

AFTY vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQQQ

CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 28
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFTY vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFTY	CQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.19	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AFTY	CQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-73.99%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-24.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.96%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-49.18%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-28.29%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.39%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AFTY	CQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.88%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	29.78%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	38.02%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	33.30%	—

AFTY vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AFTY and CQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.70%.

Dividends

AFTY vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.23%	2.08%	1.84%	1.48%	7.96%	1.85%	6.62%	1.19%	16.76%
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.11%	2.17%	0.28%	0.55%	0.08%	0.00%	0.47%	0.01%	0.43%	1.41%	1.69%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFTY and CQQQ in my portfolio?

AFTY and CQQQ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AFTY or CQQQ?

Both ETFs have the same 0.70% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AFTY or CQQQ?

AFTY and CQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.70% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AFTY or CQQQ?

CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.00% for AFTY.

What is the main difference between AFTY and CQQQ?

AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50, while CQQQ tracks AlphaShares China Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco.