AFSM vs. VB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AFSM (First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. AFSM is actively managed, while VB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFSM returned 8.53%/yr vs 7.11%/yr for VB. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFSM charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.

Performance

AFSM vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFSM achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 14.16% return.

AFSM

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 3.29%
• YTD: 15.65%
• 6M: 15.19%
• 1Y: 30.17%
• 3Y*: 17.93%
• 5Y*: 8.53%
• 10Y*: —

VB

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 14.16%
• 6M: 14.12%
• 1Y: 28.82%
• 3Y*: 17.05%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 11.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFSM vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AFSM First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF	15.65%	9.99%	10.55%	22.23%	-17.50%	26.03%	8.44%	2.63%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	14.16%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between AFSM and VB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019	0.94

The correlation between AFSM and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

AFSM vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AFSM	VB
Technology	20.3%	17.2%
Healthcare	17.8%	11.1%
Industrials	16.9%	20.8%
Financial Services	14.9%	12.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	11.3%
Energy	5.3%	4.7%
Basic Materials	4.9%	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	3.4%
Real Estate	3.8%	7.6%
Communication Services	2.3%	3.1%
Utilities	0.3%	3.3%

Return for Risk

AFSM vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFSM

AFSM Risk / Return Rank: 54
AFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
AFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
AFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 46
AFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
AFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 59

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 56
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 48
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFSM vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AFSM	VB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.78	-0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	2.56	-0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.31	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	3.22	-0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.41	11.87	-1.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AFSM vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFSM and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFSM	VB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	1.78	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.34	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.44	0.00

Drawdowns

AFSM vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFSM drawdown since its inception was -43.54%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFSM and VB.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFSM	VB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.54%	-59.56%	+16.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.56%	-8.98%	-0.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.07%	-25.36%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.27%	-28.15%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	-0.65%	-0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.48%	-8.44%	-1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	2.43%	+0.47%

Volatility

AFSM vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.42%. This indicates that AFSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFSM	VB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	4.42%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.14%	11.72%	+1.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.89%	16.28%	+1.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.82%	20.74%	+0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.40%	21.42%	+3.98%

AFSM vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFSM has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFSM vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

AFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than VB's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFSM First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF	0.47%	0.58%	0.58%	0.92%	1.28%	0.35%	0.53%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.19%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFSM and VB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, AFSM and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AFSM or VB?

AFSM has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to VB (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFSM dropped -43.54% vs VB's -59.56%.

Which ETF is better, AFSM or VB?

On 5-year performance, AFSM leads with 8.53% vs 7.11% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AFSM or VB?

Over the 5-year period, AFSM has performed better with a 8.53% return vs 7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AFSM or VB?

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for AFSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AFSM or VB?

VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.47% for AFSM.

What is the main difference between AFSM and VB?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for AFSM and 0.05% for VB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.