PortfoliosLab logo
AFSM vs. IWC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AFSM and IWC is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

AFSM vs. IWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) and iShares Microcap ETF (IWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AFSM:

0.08

IWC:

0.13

Sortino Ratio

AFSM:

0.27

IWC:

0.36

Omega Ratio

AFSM:

1.03

IWC:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

AFSM:

0.06

IWC:

0.09

Martin Ratio

AFSM:

0.16

IWC:

0.30

Ulcer Index

AFSM:

9.40%

IWC:

10.56%

Daily Std Dev

AFSM:

23.39%

IWC:

27.46%

Max Drawdown

AFSM:

-43.54%

IWC:

-64.61%

Current Drawdown

AFSM:

-12.20%

IWC:

-21.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFSM achieves a -3.18% return, which is significantly higher than IWC's -8.01% return.


AFSM

YTD

-3.18%

1M

4.72%

6M

-11.13%

1Y

1.39%

3Y*

7.55%

5Y*

13.01%

10Y*

N/A

IWC

YTD

-8.01%

1M

7.49%

6M

-13.12%

1Y

3.00%

3Y*

2.50%

5Y*

8.85%

10Y*

5.31%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Microcap ETF

AFSM vs. IWC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFSM has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than IWC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AFSM vs. IWC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFSM is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFSM is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFSM is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFSM is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFSM is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFSM is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

IWC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWC is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWC is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWC is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWC is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWC is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWC is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AFSM vs. IWC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) and iShares Microcap ETF (IWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AFSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the IWC Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFSM and IWC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AFSM vs. IWC - Dividend Comparison

AFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than IWC's 1.17% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AFSM
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
0.69%0.59%0.92%1.28%0.36%0.53%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWC
iShares Microcap ETF
1.17%1.06%1.17%1.18%0.78%0.98%1.19%1.01%1.09%1.16%1.49%1.11%

Drawdowns

AFSM vs. IWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFSM drawdown since its inception was -43.54%, smaller than the maximum IWC drawdown of -64.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFSM and IWC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AFSM vs. IWC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) is 5.57%, while iShares Microcap ETF (IWC) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that AFSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...