AFSM vs. CSB
AFSM (First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF) and CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. AFSM is actively managed, while CSB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFSM returned 8.53%/yr vs 3.65%/yr for CSB. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFSM charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSB.
Performance
AFSM vs. CSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFSM achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 8.30% return.
AFSM
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 30.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- —
CSB
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
AFSM vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFSM First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF | 15.65% | 9.99% | 10.55% | 22.23% | -17.50% | 26.03% | 8.44% | 2.63% |
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 8.30% | 2.26% | 9.64% | 12.60% | -13.11% | 27.04% | 11.30% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFSM and CSB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between AFSM and CSB shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AFSM vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFSM
CSB
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
AFSM
CSB
Healthcare
AFSM
CSB
Industrials
AFSM
CSB
Financial Services
AFSM
CSB
Consumer Cyclical
AFSM
CSB
Energy
AFSM
CSB
Basic Materials
AFSM
CSB
Consumer Defensive
AFSM
CSB
Real Estate
AFSM
CSB
-
Communication Services
AFSM
CSB
Utilities
AFSM
CSB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFSM vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank
AFSM
CSB
AFSM vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFSM | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 1.25 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 1.92 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.22 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 2.51 | +0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.41 | 7.26 | +3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFSM | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.25 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.20 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
AFSM vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFSM drawdown since its inception was -43.54%, roughly equal to the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFSM and CSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFSM | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.54% | -42.07% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -7.18% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.07% | -21.82% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.27% | -24.49% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -3.12% | +1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -7.14% | -2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.48% | +0.42% |
Volatility
AFSM vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.59%. This indicates that AFSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFSM | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 3.59% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 9.19% | +3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.89% | 14.54% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 18.78% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 21.31% | +4.09% |
AFSM vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFSM has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFSM vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison
AFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than CSB's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFSM First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.92% | 1.28% | 0.35% | 0.53% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.26% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFSM and CSB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFSM has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFSM dropped -43.54% vs CSB's -42.07%.
On 5-year performance, AFSM leads with 8.53% vs 3.65% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AFSM has performed better with a 8.53% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for AFSM.
CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.47% for AFSM.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for AFSM and 0.35% for CSB.
AFSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFSM and CSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer