PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFRU vs. OKTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFRU vs. OKTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -15.53% return, which is significantly lower than OKTG's 110.88% return.


AFRU

1D
-4.36%
1M
9.55%
6M
-8.31%
YTD
-15.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OKTG

1D
-4.61%
1M
54.71%
6M
88.98%
YTD
110.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFRU vs. OKTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AFRU and OKTG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFRU vs. OKTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFRU vs. OKTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFRU vs. OKTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, which is greater than OKTG's maximum drawdown of -60.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and OKTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFRUOKTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.44%

-60.69%

-23.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.05%

-9.20%

-43.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.74%

-22.77%

-32.97%

Volatility

AFRU vs. OKTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFRUOKTGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

121.44%

133.12%

-11.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.44%

133.12%

-11.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.44%

133.12%

-11.68%

AFRU vs. OKTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than OKTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFRU vs. OKTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither AFRU nor OKTG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AFRU and OKTG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OKTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OKTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.

AFRU and OKTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AFRU and 0.75% for OKTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFRU and OKTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer