PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFRU vs. LULG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFRU vs. LULG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -38.11% return, which is significantly higher than LULG's -68.07% return.


AFRU

1D
-13.32%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
-38.11%
6M
-32.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LULG

1D
-0.95%
1M
-6.81%
YTD
-68.07%
6M
-59.49%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFRU vs. LULG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AFRU and LULG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFRU vs. LULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFRU vs. LULG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFRULULGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

-0.86

+0.23

Drawdowns

AFRU vs. LULG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, which is greater than LULG's maximum drawdown of -73.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and LULG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFRULULGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.44%

-73.18%

-11.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.60%

-70.43%

+4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.01%

-33.45%

-22.56%

Volatility

AFRU vs. LULG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFRULULGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

121.30%

85.71%

+35.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.30%

85.71%

+35.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.30%

85.71%

+35.59%

AFRU vs. LULG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LULG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFRU vs. LULG - Dividend Comparison

Neither AFRU nor LULG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AFRU and LULG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.

AFRU and LULG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AFRU and 0.75% for LULG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFRU and LULG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer