AFOS vs. MOO
AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFOS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MOO.
Performance
AFOS vs. MOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFOS achieves a 31.60% return, which is significantly higher than MOO's 5.15% return.
AFOS
- 1D
- -3.79%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 31.60%
- 6M
- 30.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOO
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 5.15%
- 6M
- 5.57%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- 1.24%
- 5Y*
- -1.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.00%
AFOS vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 31.60% | 37.10% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 5.15% | 2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFOS and MOO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFOS vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank
AFOS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MOO
AFOS vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFOS | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFOS vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFOS drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOS and MOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFOS | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -69.53% | +58.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.79% | -21.21% | +17.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -16.97% | +15.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.01% | — |
Volatility
AFOS vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFOS | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.52% | 14.06% | +7.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 17.13% | +4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 18.14% | +3.38% |
AFOS vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFOS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFOS vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison
AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than MOO's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 2.35% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 2.93% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.26% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFOS and MOO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MOO.
MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.23% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AFOS and 0.55% for MOO.
Find the right allocation for AFOS and MOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer