PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFOS vs. BLUC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFOS vs. BLUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFOS achieves a 32.04% return, which is significantly higher than BLUC's 10.25% return.


AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLUC

1D
-1.43%
1M
5.44%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFOS vs. BLUC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
32.04%36.15%
BLUC
Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF
10.25%11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between AFOS and BLUC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFOS vs. BLUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFOS vs. BLUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFOSBLUCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.35

2.11

+2.23

Drawdowns

AFOS vs. BLUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFOS drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, which is greater than BLUC's maximum drawdown of -10.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOS and BLUC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFOSBLUCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-10.69%

-0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-1.43%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-1.52%

+0.15%

Volatility

AFOS vs. BLUC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFOSBLUCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.19%

13.00%

+7.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

13.00%

+7.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

13.00%

+7.19%

AFOS vs. BLUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFOS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUC's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFOS vs. BLUC - Dividend Comparison

AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than BLUC's 0.51% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AFOS and BLUC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BLUC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLUC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

BLUC has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AFOS and 0.23% for BLUC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFOS and BLUC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer