AFNIX vs. PDT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AFNIX (AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I) and PDT (John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund) are both mutual funds - AFNIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by AAM, while PDT is a Dividend fund managed by John Hancock. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFNIX charges 0.83%/yr vs 5.06%/yr for PDT.

Performance

AFNIX vs. PDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AFNIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PDT

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 3.84%
• 6M: 3.30%
• 1Y: 4.47%
• 3Y*: 12.74%
• 5Y*: 2.52%
• 10Y*: 6.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFNIX vs. PDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I	1.74%	11.36%	16.23%	6.59%	-8.77%	25.23%	6.60%	25.71%	-1.98%	19.51%
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund	3.84%	7.64%	29.92%	-9.55%	-16.30%	25.98%	-14.20%	39.29%	-12.49%	21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between AFNIX and PDT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.44

The correlation between AFNIX and PDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AFNIX vs. PDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDT

PDT Risk / Return Rank: 7
PDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PDT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PDT Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFNIX vs. PDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFNIX	PDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.31	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AFNIX	PDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-62.39%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.38%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.44%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-4.11%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.02%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AFNIX	PDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	8.93%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.03%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	25.16%	—

AFNIX vs. PDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFNIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than PDT's 5.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFNIX vs. PDT - Dividend Comparison

AFNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.18%, more than PDT's 7.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I	31.18%	14.13%	6.88%	3.43%	4.61%	1.78%	1.75%	2.13%	2.04%	1.72%	1.79%	2.66%
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund	7.75%	7.80%	7.77%	10.14%	9.04%	6.42%	8.43%	6.70%	8.69%	9.94%	9.15%	7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFNIX and PDT in my portfolio?

AFNIX and PDT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.