AFNIX vs. PDT
Compare and contrast key facts about AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT).
AFNIX is managed by AAM. It was launched on Jul 5, 2012. PDT is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 14, 1989.
Performance
AFNIX vs. PDT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AFNIX vs. PDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I | 1.74% | 11.36% | 16.23% | 6.59% | -8.77% | 25.23% | 6.60% | 25.71% | -1.98% | 19.51% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 5.12% | 7.64% | 29.92% | -9.55% | -16.30% | 25.98% | -14.20% | 39.29% | -12.49% | 21.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFNIX achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than PDT's 5.12% return. Over the past 10 years, AFNIX has outperformed PDT with an annualized return of 10.47%, while PDT has yielded a comparatively lower 7.10% annualized return.
AFNIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
PDT
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 8.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFNIX vs. PDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFNIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than PDT's 5.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AFNIX vs. PDT — Risk / Return Rank
AFNIX
PDT
AFNIX vs. PDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFNIX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.61 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 0.87 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.14 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 0.84 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | 3.30 | +2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFNIX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.61 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.33 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.28 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.32 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between AFNIX and PDT is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AFNIX vs. PDT - Dividend Comparison
AFNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.45%, more than PDT's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I | 31.45% | 14.13% | 6.88% | 3.43% | 4.61% | 1.78% | 1.75% | 2.13% | 2.04% | 1.72% | 1.79% | 2.66% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 7.56% | 7.80% | 7.77% | 10.14% | 9.04% | 6.42% | 8.43% | 6.70% | 8.69% | 9.94% | 9.15% | 7.88% |
Drawdowns
AFNIX vs. PDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFNIX drawdown since its inception was -35.60%, smaller than the maximum PDT drawdown of -62.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFNIX and PDT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFNIX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.60% | -62.39% | +26.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.43% | -10.34% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.57% | -40.44% | +20.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.60% | -62.39% | +26.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.60% | -2.93% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -10.06% | +6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 2.67% | -0.55% |
Volatility
AFNIX vs. PDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) is 3.07%, while John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that AFNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AFNIX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 4.21% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.63% | 7.16% | -0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.64% | 13.21% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 17.06% | -3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 25.18% | -8.93% |