AFNIX vs. VTV
Compare and contrast key facts about AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV).
AFNIX is managed by AAM. It was launched on Jul 5, 2012. VTV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Prime Market Value Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AFNIX or VTV.
Key characteristics
AFNIX | VTV | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 16.93% | 17.08% |
1Y Return | 21.16% | 23.61% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 7.00% | 9.62% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 10.19% | 12.70% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 9.88% | 10.50% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.98 | 2.21 |
Daily Std Dev | 10.60% | 10.44% |
Max Drawdown | -35.60% | -59.27% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFNIX and VTV is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AFNIX vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AFNIX having a 16.93% return and VTV slightly higher at 17.08%. Over the past 10 years, AFNIX has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 9.88%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.50% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFNIX vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFNIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AFNIX vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AFNIX vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
AFNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than VTV's 2.28% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I | 2.81% | 3.62% | 4.61% | 1.78% | 1.75% | 2.13% | 2.04% | 1.72% | 1.79% | 2.66% | 2.00% | 2.24% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 2.28% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% | 2.22% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
AFNIX vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFNIX drawdown since its inception was -35.60%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFNIX and VTV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AFNIX vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) have volatilities of 4.32% and 4.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.