AFMFX vs. QQQI
AFMFX (American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both funds - AFMFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by American Funds, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, AFMFX returned 17.61% vs 30.41% for QQQI. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFMFX charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
AFMFX vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFMFX achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.43% return.
AFMFX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 17.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 30.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFMFX vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AFMFX American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 | 6.78% | 16.43% | 13.49% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.43% | 18.62% | 19.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFMFX and QQQI is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between AFMFX and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFMFX vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
AFMFX
QQQI
AFMFX vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 (AFMFX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFMFX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.18 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 14.27 | -5.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFMFX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 2.35 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.34 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
AFMFX vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFMFX drawdown since its inception was -29.79%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMFX and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFMFX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.79% | -20.00% | -9.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.90% | -9.61% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.17% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -2.20% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 2.14% | -0.18% |
Volatility
AFMFX vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 (AFMFX) is 2.36%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that AFMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFMFX | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 2.68% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.36% | 9.85% | -2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 12.98% | -3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 17.07% | -4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 17.07% | -2.57% |
AFMFX vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFMFX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFMFX vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
AFMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, less than QQQI's 13.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFMFX American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 | 7.40% | 7.86% | 6.60% | 4.06% | 5.20% | 3.58% | 2.22% | 4.89% | 6.75% | 6.25% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.19% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFMFX and QQQI have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQI has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to AFMFX (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFMFX dropped -29.79% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFMFX and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer