PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFMFX vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFMFX vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 (AFMFX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFMFX achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.43% return.


AFMFX

1D
0.62%
1M
2.98%
YTD
6.78%
6M
7.02%
1Y
17.61%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*

QQQI

1D
-0.17%
1M
6.91%
YTD
13.43%
6M
12.92%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFMFX vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AFMFX
American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3
6.78%16.43%13.49%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.43%18.62%19.83%

Correlation

The correlation between AFMFX and QQQI is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

0.67

The correlation between AFMFX and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFMFX vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFMFX
AFMFX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
AFMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AFMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFMFX vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 (AFMFX) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFMFXQQQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.18

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

14.27

-5.01

AFMFX vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFMFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFMFX and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFMFXQQQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.35

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.34

-0.57

Drawdowns

AFMFX vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFMFX drawdown since its inception was -29.79%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMFX and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFMFXQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.79%

-20.00%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-9.61%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.17%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.92%

-2.20%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.14%

-0.18%

Volatility

AFMFX vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 (AFMFX) is 2.36%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that AFMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFMFXQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

2.68%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.36%

9.85%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

12.98%

-3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.50%

17.07%

-4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

17.07%

-2.57%

AFMFX vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFMFX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFMFX vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

AFMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, less than QQQI's 13.19% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFMFX
American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3
7.40%7.86%6.60%4.06%5.20%3.58%2.22%4.89%6.75%6.25%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.19%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFMFX and QQQI have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQI has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to AFMFX (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFMFX dropped -29.79% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFMFX and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer