AFMC vs. DWAT
AFMC (First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. Both are actively managed. AFMC charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.
Performance
AFMC vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AFMC
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 28.05%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFMC vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | 7.27% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
AFMC vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFMC
DWAT
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
AFMC
DWAT
Industrials
AFMC
DWAT
Consumer Cyclical
AFMC
DWAT
Healthcare
AFMC
DWAT
Financial Services
AFMC
DWAT
Real Estate
AFMC
DWAT
Basic Materials
AFMC
DWAT
Consumer Defensive
AFMC
DWAT
Energy
AFMC
DWAT
Communication Services
AFMC
DWAT
Utilities
AFMC
DWAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFMC vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank
AFMC
DWAT
AFMC vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFMC | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFMC | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | — | — |
Drawdowns
AFMC vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFMC drawdown since its inception was -42.14%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMC and DWAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFMC | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.14% | 0.00% | -42.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.62% | 0.00% | -7.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | — | — |
Volatility
AFMC vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFMC | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.94% | 0.00% | +14.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 0.00% | +18.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 0.00% | +22.93% |
AFMC vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFMC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFMC vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
AFMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | 0.78% | 0.96% | 0.64% | 0.87% | 1.42% | 0.84% | 1.05% | 0.29% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, AFMC is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFMC is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.
AFMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.
AFMC is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for AFMC and 1.83% for DWAT.
Find the right allocation for AFMC and DWAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer