AFMC vs. CTEF
AFMC (First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFMC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.
Performance
AFMC vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFMC achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 29.35% return.
AFMC
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 28.05%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
CTEF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 29.35%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFMC vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | 16.54% | 10.79% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 29.35% | 33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFMC and CTEF is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFMC vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank
AFMC
CTEF
AFMC vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFMC | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFMC | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 3.54 | -3.00 |
Drawdowns
AFMC vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFMC drawdown since its inception was -42.14%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMC and CTEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFMC | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.14% | -15.00% | -27.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.41% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.62% | -1.80% | -5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | — | — |
Volatility
AFMC vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFMC | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.94% | 21.81% | -6.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 21.81% | -2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 21.81% | +1.12% |
AFMC vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFMC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFMC vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison
AFMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | 0.78% | 0.96% | 0.64% | 0.87% | 1.42% | 0.84% | 1.05% | 0.29% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFMC and CTEF have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AFMC.
AFMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for AFMC and 0.45% for CTEF.
Find the right allocation for AFMC and CTEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer