AFMBX vs. VUG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AFMBX (American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-3) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both funds - AFMBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Over the past 5 years, AFMBX returned 9.99%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for VUG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFMBX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.

Performance

AFMBX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-3 (AFMBX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFMBX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 3.52% return.

AFMBX

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 1.44%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 9.44%
• 1Y: 23.09%
• 3Y*: 17.46%
• 5Y*: 9.99%
• 10Y*: —

VUG

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: -3.95%
• YTD: 3.52%
• 6M: 2.23%
• 1Y: 20.05%
• 3Y*: 22.74%
• 5Y*: 12.80%
• 10Y*: 18.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFMBX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AFMBX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-3	9.53%	18.82%	15.36%	13.89%	-11.83%	16.12%	11.17%	18.96%	-3.07%	10.06%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	3.52%	19.40%	32.69%	46.83%	-33.16%	27.35%	40.25%	37.03%	-3.32%	17.49%

Correlation

The correlation between AFMBX and VUG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2017	0.86

The correlation between AFMBX and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AFMBX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFMBX

AFMBX Risk / Return Rank: 83
AFMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AFMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AFMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AFMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
AFMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 31
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFMBX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-3 (AFMBX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AFMBX	VUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	1.19	+1.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	1.67	+1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.21	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	1.22	+2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.13	4.15	+10.99

AFMBX vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFMBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFMBX and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AFMBX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFMBX drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMBX and VUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFMBX	VUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.34%	-50.68%	+28.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.98%	-16.53%	+9.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.64%	-22.85%	+12.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.58%	-35.61%	+17.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-6.88%	+6.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.19%	-7.09%	+3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	4.84%	-3.26%

Volatility

AFMBX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-3 (AFMBX) is 3.42%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that AFMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFMBX	VUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	6.86%	-3.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.31%	13.44%	-6.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.22%	16.91%	-7.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.57%	22.39%	-11.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.16%	21.51%	-10.35%

AFMBX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFMBX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AFMBX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

AFMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.42%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFMBX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-3	7.42%	8.57%	7.51%	2.27%	2.63%	4.60%	4.65%	3.78%	5.81%	4.94%	0.00%	0.00%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.39%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFMBX and VUG in my portfolio?

AFMBX and VUG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AFMBX or VUG?

VUG has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to AFMBX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFMBX dropped -22.34% vs VUG's -50.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AFMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.