PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFMBX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFMBX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-3 (AFMBX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AFMBX having a 9.91% return and VOO slightly lower at 9.75%.


AFMBX

1D
0.84%
1M
1.79%
YTD
9.91%
6M
10.23%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFMBX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFMBX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-3
9.91%18.82%15.36%13.89%-11.83%16.12%11.17%18.96%-3.07%10.06%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between AFMBX and VOO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2017

0.94

The correlation between AFMBX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFMBX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFMBX
AFMBX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AFMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AFMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFMBX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-3 (AFMBX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFMBXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.39

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.02

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.32

13.58

+1.74

AFMBX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFMBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFMBX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFMBX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFMBX drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMBX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFMBXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.34%

-33.99%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.98%

-8.90%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.64%

-18.69%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

-24.52%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-1.74%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-3.68%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.98%

-0.41%

Volatility

AFMBX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-3 (AFMBX) is 3.46%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that AFMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFMBXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

4.60%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.35%

9.73%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

12.39%

-3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.57%

16.90%

-6.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.16%

18.05%

-6.89%

AFMBX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFMBX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AFMBX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

AFMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFMBX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class F-3
7.39%8.57%7.51%2.27%2.63%4.60%4.65%3.78%5.81%4.94%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, AFMBX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOO has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to AFMBX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFMBX dropped -22.34% vs VOO's -33.99%.

AFMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFMBX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer