AFLG vs. SCHB
AFLG (First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while SCHB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFLG returned 12.91%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for SCHB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFLG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
AFLG vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFLG achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's 11.28% return.
AFLG
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 24.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHB
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
AFLG vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 12.37% | 14.23% | 27.02% | 20.10% | -16.41% | 27.29% | 10.31% | 2.77% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 11.28% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 20.76% | 3.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFLG and SCHB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between AFLG and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
AFLG vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFLG
SCHB
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
AFLG
SCHB
Consumer Cyclical
AFLG
SCHB
Communication Services
AFLG
SCHB
Financial Services
AFLG
SCHB
Industrials
AFLG
SCHB
Healthcare
AFLG
SCHB
Consumer Defensive
AFLG
SCHB
Utilities
AFLG
SCHB
Real Estate
AFLG
SCHB
Basic Materials
AFLG
SCHB
Energy
AFLG
SCHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFLG vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
AFLG
SCHB
AFLG vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFLG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.17 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.04 | 14.55 | -0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFLG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.33 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.74 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.83 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
AFLG vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFLG drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLG and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFLG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -35.27% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.19% | -8.91% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.49% | -19.34% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.48% | -25.41% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.72% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -4.12% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.94% | -0.16% |
Volatility
AFLG vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) have volatilities of 2.86% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFLG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 3.01% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 9.14% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 12.12% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 17.24% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 18.32% | +0.88% |
AFLG vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFLG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFLG vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
AFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than SCHB's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 0.70% | 0.84% | 0.53% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 0.93% | 1.28% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, AFLG and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHB has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to AFLG (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFLG dropped -35.84% vs SCHB's -35.27%.
On 5-year performance, AFLG leads with 12.91% vs 12.76% for SCHB. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AFLG has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AFLG has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AFLG.
SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.70% for AFLG.
AFLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. AFLG tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AFLG and 0.03% for SCHB.
SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFLG and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer