AFLG vs. DLN
AFLG (First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - AFLG tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index while DLN tracks the WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFLG returned 12.91%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for DLN. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFLG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
AFLG vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFLG achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.93% return.
AFLG
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 24.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- —
DLN
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
AFLG vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 12.37% | 14.23% | 27.02% | 20.10% | -16.41% | 27.29% | 10.31% | 2.77% |
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 9.93% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | -3.78% | 25.60% | 4.59% | 3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFLG and DLN is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between AFLG and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
AFLG vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFLG
DLN
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
AFLG
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
AFLG
DLN
Communication Services
AFLG
DLN
Financial Services
AFLG
DLN
Industrials
AFLG
DLN
Healthcare
AFLG
DLN
Consumer Defensive
AFLG
DLN
Utilities
AFLG
DLN
Real Estate
AFLG
DLN
Basic Materials
AFLG
DLN
Energy
AFLG
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFLG vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
AFLG
DLN
AFLG vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFLG | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.69 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.04 | 15.59 | -1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFLG | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.53 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.93 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.53 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
AFLG vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFLG drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLG and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFLG | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -57.84% | +22.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.19% | -6.10% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.49% | -13.71% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.48% | -16.26% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.51% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -7.52% | +1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.44% | +0.34% |
Volatility
AFLG vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that AFLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFLG | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 2.17% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 6.77% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 8.87% | +2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 13.26% | +2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 16.16% | +3.04% |
AFLG vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFLG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFLG vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
AFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 0.70% | 0.84% | 0.53% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 0.93% | 1.28% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFLG and DLN have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFLG has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFLG dropped -35.84% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 5-year performance, AFLG leads with 12.91% vs 12.22% for DLN. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AFLG has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AFLG.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.70% for AFLG.
AFLG tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AFLG and 0.28% for DLN.
DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFLG and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer